The abuse of power: The pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis
被引:1384
作者:
Hoenig, JM
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Virginia Inst Marine Sci, Coll William & Mary, Gloucester Point, VA 23062 USAVirginia Inst Marine Sci, Coll William & Mary, Gloucester Point, VA 23062 USA
Hoenig, JM
[1
]
Heisey, DM
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Virginia Inst Marine Sci, Coll William & Mary, Gloucester Point, VA 23062 USA
Heisey, DM
机构:
[1] Virginia Inst Marine Sci, Coll William & Mary, Gloucester Point, VA 23062 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Surg, Madison, WI 53792 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, Madison, WI 53792 USA
bioequivalence testing;
burden of proof;
observed power;
retrospective power analysis;
statistical power;
type II error;
D O I:
10.1198/000313001300339897
中图分类号:
O21 [概率论与数理统计];
C8 [统计学];
学科分类号:
020208 ;
070103 ;
0714 ;
摘要:
It is well known that statistical power calculations can be valuable in planning an experiment. There is also a large literature advocating that power calculations be made whenever one performs a statistical test of a hypothesis and one obtains a statistically nonsignificant result. Advocates of such post-experiment power calculations claim the calculations should be used to aid in the interpretation of the experimental results. This approach, which appears in various forms, is fundamentally flawed. We document that the problem is extensive and present arguments to demonstrate the flaw in the logic.