Intraoperative nerve stimulation predicts postoperative potency

被引:13
作者
Chang, SS [1 ]
Peterson, M [1 ]
Smith, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Urol Surg, Med Ctr N A 1302, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01310-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. Intraoperative nerve stimulation has been used to map the course of cavernosal nerve bundles to aid in nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (RP). We sought to determine whether the intraoperative nerve stimulation response after removal of the prostate specimen predicts postoperative potency. Methods. We prospectively evaluated 63 consecutive patients undergoing RP. Among these 63 patients, 41 patients had a bilateral nerve-sparing procedure, and 22 underwent bilateral wide resection of the neurovascular bundles. Potency was determined at I year by direct patient interview. Results. Of the 22 patients with wide resection, 16 (73%) had no observed stimulated response, 4 (18%) had a measurable tumescence response, and 2 (9%) had detumescence. All 22 patients were impotent postoperatively. At a minimum follow-up of 1 year, of the 41 patients who underwent nerve-sparing RP, 27 (66%) had postoperative erections sufficient for penetration. Of the 30 men with an intraoperative stimulated tumescence response, 24 (80%) were potent; of the 6 with a detumescence response, 2 (33%) were potent; and of the 5 with no stimulated nerve response, 1 (20%) was potent. A tumescence response was significantly more predictive of postoperative potency than no intraoperative response (P = 0.017). Conclusions. An intraoperative tumescence response with stimulation of the neurovascular bundles after prostate specimen removal is more likely to correspond to successful postoperative sexual function after nerve-sparing RP than is no response. (C) 2001, Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:594 / 597
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
DROLLER MJ, 1993, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V270, P83
[2]   Health outcomes variables important to patients in the treatment of erectile dysfunction [J].
Hanson-Divers, C ;
Jackson, SE ;
Lue, TF ;
Crawford, SY ;
Rosen, RC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (05) :1541-1547
[3]   Variability of results of cavernous nerve stimulation during radical prostatectomy [J].
Holzbeierlein, J ;
Peterson, M ;
Smith, JA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (01) :108-110
[4]   A positive CaverMap response poorly predicts recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy [J].
Kim, HL ;
Stoffel, DS ;
Mhoon, DA ;
Brendler, CB .
UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (04) :561-564
[5]  
Klot Laurence, 1999, Journal of Urology, V161, P335
[6]  
Klotz L, 1998, UROLOGY, V52, P537, DOI 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00319-7
[7]   A randomized phase 3 study of intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation with penile tumescence monitoring to improve nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy [J].
Klotz, L ;
Heaton, J ;
Jewett, M ;
Chin, J ;
Fleshner, N ;
Goldenberg, L ;
Gleave, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (05) :1573-1578
[8]   INTRAOPERATIVE ELECTROSTIMULATION OF THE CAVERNOUS NERVE - TECHNIQUE, RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS [J].
LUE, TF ;
GLEASON, CA ;
BROCK, GB ;
CARROLL, PR ;
TANAGHO, EA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (04) :1426-1428
[9]   Is intraoperative electrostimulation of erectile nerves possible? [J].
Michl, U ;
Dietz, R ;
Huland, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (05) :1610-1613
[10]   RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY WITH PRESERVATION OF SEXUAL FUNCTION - ANATOMICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
WALSH, PC ;
LEPOR, H ;
EGGLESTON, JC .
PROSTATE, 1983, 4 (05) :473-485