Influence of heart rate, blood pressure, and beta-blocker dose on outcome and the differences in outcome between carvedilol and metoprolol tartrate in patients with chronic heart failure: results from the COMET trial

被引:136
作者
Metra, M
Torp-Pedersen, C
Swedberg, K
Cleland, JGF
Di Lenarda, A
Komajda, M
Remme, WJ
Lutiger, B
Scherhag, A
Lukas, MA
Charlesworth, A
Poole-Wilson, PA
机构
[1] Univ Brescia, Cattedra Cardiol, I-25121 Brescia, Italy
[2] Bispebjerg Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Univ Hull, Dept Cardiol, Kingston Upon Hull, Yorks, England
[5] Osped Cattinara, Dept Cardiol, Trieste, Italy
[6] Hop La Pitie Salpetriere, Dept Cardiol, Paris, France
[7] Sticares Cardiovasc Res Fdn, Rhoon, Netherlands
[8] F Hoffmann La Roche & Co Ltd, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
[9] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Hosp Mannheim, Med Clin 1, D-6900 Heidelberg, Germany
[10] GlaxoSmithKline Inc, Philadelphia, PA USA
[11] Nottingham Clin Res Grp, Nottingham, England
[12] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Natl Heart & Lung Inst, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
heart failure; trials; beta-blockers;
D O I
10.1093/eurheartj/ehi386
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims We studied the influence of heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and beta-blocker dose on outcome in the 2599 out of 3029 patients in Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET) who were alive and on study drug at 4 months after randomization (time of first visit on maintenance therapy). Methods and results By multivariable analysis, baseline HR, baseline SBP, and their change after 4 months were not independently related to subsequent outcome. In a multivariable analysis including clinical variables, HR above and SBP below the median value achieved at 4 months predicted subsequent increased mortality [relative risk (RR) for HR > 68 b.p.m. 1.333; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.152-1.542; P < 0.0001 and RR for SBP > 120 mmHg 0.78; 95% CI 0.671-0.907; P < 0.0013]. Achieving target beta-blocker dose was associated with a better outcome (RR 0.779; 95% CI 0.662-0.916; P < 0.0025). The superiority of carvedilol as compared to metoprolol tartrate was maintained in a multivariable model (RR 0.767; 95% CI 0.663-0.887; P=0.0004) and there was no interaction with HR, SBP, or beta-blocker dose. Conclusion Beta-blocker dose, HR, and SBP achieved during beta-blocker therapy have independent prognostic value in heart failure. None of these factors influenced the beneficial effects of carvedilol when compared with metoprolol tartrate at the pre-defined target doses used in COMET.
引用
收藏
页码:2259 / 2268
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[11]  
GRAMBSCH PM, 1994, BIOMETRIKA, V81, P515
[12]   What resting heart rate should one aim for when treating patients with heart failure with a beta-blocker?: Experiences from the Metoprolol Controlled Release Extended Release Randomized Intervention Trial in Chronic Heart Failure (MERIT-HF) [J].
Gullestad, L ;
Wikstrand, J ;
Deedwania, P ;
Hjalmarson, Å ;
Egstrup, K ;
Elkayam, U ;
Gottlieb, S ;
Rashkow, A ;
Wedel, H ;
Bermann, G ;
Kjekshus, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (02) :252-259
[13]  
Hjalmarson Å, 1999, LANCET, V353, P2001
[14]   Interaction between cardiac sympathetic drive and heart rate in heart failure - Modulation by adrenergic receptor genotype [J].
Kaye, DM ;
Smirk, B ;
Finch, S ;
Williams, C ;
Esler, MD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (10) :2008-2015
[15]   Carvedilol but not metoprolol reduces β-adrenergic responsiveness after complete elimination from plasma in vivo [J].
Kindermann, M ;
Maack, C ;
Schaller, S ;
Finkler, N ;
Schmidt, KI ;
Läer, S ;
Wuttke, H ;
Schäfers, HJ ;
Böhm, M .
CIRCULATION, 2004, 109 (25) :3182-3190
[16]  
Lechat P, 1997, CIRCULATION, V96, P2197
[17]  
Lechat P, 1999, LANCET, V353, P9
[18]   Heart rate and cardiac rhythm relationships with bisoprolol benefit in chronic heart failure in CIBISII trial [J].
Lechat, P ;
Hulot, JS ;
Escolano, S ;
Mallet, A ;
Leizorovicz, A ;
Werhlen-Grandjean, M ;
Pochmalicki, G ;
Dargie, H .
CIRCULATION, 2001, 103 (10) :1428-1433
[19]  
Lechat Philippe P, 2003, Card Electrophysiol Rev, V7, P233, DOI 10.1023/B:CEPR.0000012389.01561.27
[20]   A comment on COMET: How to interpret a positive trial? [J].
Massie, BM .
JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2003, 9 (06) :425-428