Evaluation of novel agars for the enumeration of Campylobacter spp. in poultry retail samples

被引:23
作者
Ahmed, R. [2 ,3 ]
Leon-Velarde, C. G. [2 ]
Odumeru, J. A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Minist Environm, Lab Serv Branch, Directors Off, Etobicoke, ON M9P 3V6, Canada
[2] Univ Guelph, Lab Serv Div, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[3] Univ Guelph, Dept Food Sci, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
关键词
Campylobacter; CASA; CFA; BCCA; CCA; mCCDA; JEJUNI; MEDIA; AEROTOLERANCE; INFECTION; ENTERITIS; CHICKEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.mimet.2011.12.011
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the performance of novel agars for the identification and enumeration of Campylobacter species. The analytical sensitivity and specificity of Campylobacter Selective agar (CASA), Brilliance CampyCount agar (BCCA) and CampyFoodIDagar (CFA) for 84 Campylobacter spp. isolates and 50 non-Campylobacter spp. isolates from 37 distinct genera were of 100% sensitivity, with a 98% specificity for BCCA and CFA, and a 100% specificity for CASA. The application of these selective agars for Campylobacter spp. enumeration in comparison to the conventional agars, modified charcoal cefoperazone-deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) and Campy-Cefex (CCA) was examined using Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli inoculated samples. From C. jejuni inoculated samples, recovery on BCCA was significantly greater than other media (p<0.05). Recovery on CASA was not significantly different from mCCDA and CCA (p>0.05). With C. coli inoculated samples, recovery was significantly greater on BCCA and CASA than with other media (p<0.05). The recovery of both C. jejuni and C. coli from inoculated samples with CFA was significantly less than with other media (P<0.05). CASA was able to effectively inhibit and differentiate Campylobacter spp. from background microflora while false positive organisms occurred with BCCA and CFA. An examination of 483 randomly selected suspect Campylobacter colonies from naturally contaminated samples demonstrated a colony confirmation rate for CCA, CFA, BCCA, mCCDA, and CASA, of 84%, 87%, 88%, 90%, and 100%, respectively. The media evaluated present an alternative to conventional selective agars for the identification and enumeration of thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. from samples of poultry origin through the farm to fork continuum. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 310
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Association between Campylobacter infection and Guillain-Barre syndrome [J].
Allos, BM .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1997, 176 :S125-S128
[2]  
Allos BM, 2001, CLIN INFECT DIS, V32, P1201, DOI 10.1086/319760
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 1027212006 ISO
[4]   DEVELOPMENT OF A BLOOD-FREE CAMPYLOBACTER MEDIUM - SCREENING-TESTS ON BASAL MEDIA AND SUPPLEMENTS, AND THE ABILITY OF SELECTED SUPPLEMENTS TO FACILITATE AEROTOLERANCE [J].
BOLTON, FJ ;
COATES, D .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BACTERIOLOGY, 1983, 54 (01) :115-125
[5]   Broiler Campylobacter Contamination and Human Campylobacteriosis in Iceland [J].
Callicott, Kenneth A. ;
Haroardottir, Hjordis ;
Georgsson, Franklin ;
Reiersen, Jarle ;
Frioriksdottir, Vala ;
Gunnarsson, Eggert ;
Michel, Pascal ;
Bisaillon, Jean-Robert ;
Kristinsson, Karl G. ;
Briem, Haraldur ;
Hiett, Kelli L. ;
Needleman, David S. ;
Stern, Norman J. .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 74 (21) :6483-6494
[6]   Salmonella, Campylobacter and Escherichia coli O157:H7 decontamination techniques for the future [J].
Corry, JEL ;
James, C ;
James, SJ ;
Hinton, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 28 (02) :187-196
[7]  
Dijkshoorn Lenie, 2008, P1
[8]  
Evans S., 2008, POULTRY DIS, P181
[9]   Performance characteristics and estimation of measurement uncertainty of three plating procedures for Campylobacter enumeration in chicken meat [J].
Habib, I. ;
Sampers, I. ;
Uyttendaele, M. ;
Berkvens, D. ;
De Zutter, L. .
FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 25 (01) :65-74
[10]   Measurement of Campylobacter numbers on carcasses in British poultry slaughterhouses [J].
Hutchison, ML ;
Walters, LD ;
Allen, VM ;
Mead, GC ;
Howell, M .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2006, 69 (02) :421-424