Performance comparison of two-tank direct and thermocline thermal energy storage systems for 1 MWe class concentrating solar power plants

被引:108
作者
Cocco, Daniele [1 ]
Serra, Fabio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cagliari, Dept Chem Mech & Mat Engn, I-09123 Cagliari, Italy
[2] Solar Concentrat Technol & Hydrogen RES Lab, I-09010 Uta, CA, Italy
关键词
Thermal energy storage; Thermocline storage; CSP plants; Linear Fresnel collector; ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLES; LOW-GRADE HEAT; PACKED-BED; PARABOLIC TROUGH; SIMULATION; CONVERSION; OPERATION; STEAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2014.12.067
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper compares the performance of medium size CSP (Concentrating Solar Power) plants based on an ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) power generation unit and using linear Fresnel collectors, thermal oil as heat transfer fluid and two-tank direct and thermocline energy storage systems. The comparative performance analysis was carried out by means of specifically developed simulation models and considering different values of solar multiple and thermal energy storage capacity. The results of the performance assessment demonstrate that if the CSP plant has to be optimized for the highest specific energy production, that is, for the highest solar energy conversion efficiency, two-tank energy storage systems show slightly higher performance than thermocline storage systems. However, the study also demonstrates that thermocline storage systems can be an interesting option to reduce the energy production cost of CSP plants. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 536
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[21]   A parametric study on possible fixed bed models for pcm and sensible heat storage [J].
Ismail, KAR ;
Stuginsky, R .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 19 (07) :757-788
[22]  
Kolb GJ, 2006, P ASME INT SOL EN C
[23]   Evaluation of Annual Performance of 2-Tank and Thermocline Thermal Storage Systems for Trough Plants [J].
Kolb, Gregory J. .
JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2011, 133 (03)
[24]   Thermal energy storage technologies and systems for concentrating solar power plants [J].
Kuravi, Sarada ;
Trahan, Jamie ;
Goswami, D. Yogi ;
Rahman, Muhammad M. ;
Stefanakos, Elias K. .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2013, 39 (04) :285-319
[25]   Dynamic simulation of concentrating solar power plant and two-tanks direct thermal energy storage [J].
Manenti, Flavio ;
Ravaghi-Ardebili, Zohreh .
ENERGY, 2013, 55 :89-97
[26]   Experimental and simulated temperature distribution of an oil-pebble bed thermal energy storage system with a variable heat source [J].
Mawire, A. ;
McPherson, M. .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 29 (5-6) :1086-1095
[27]   Thermocline thermal storage systems for concentrated solar power plants: One-dimensional numerical model and comparative analysis [J].
Modi, Anish ;
David Perez-Segarra, Carlos .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2014, 100 :84-93
[28]   Comparison of Linear Fresnel and Parabolic Trough Collector power plants [J].
Morin, Gabriel ;
Dersch, Juergen ;
Platzer, Werner ;
Eck, Markus ;
Haeberle, Andreas .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2012, 86 (01) :1-12
[29]   Cost and performance analysis of concentrating solar power systems with integrated latent thermal energy storage [J].
Nithyanandam, K. ;
Pitchumani, R. .
ENERGY, 2014, 64 :793-810
[30]  
Novatec Solar, NOV SOL PROD BROCH