Comparison of conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy techniques for treatment of pelvic tumors. Analysis of acute toxicity

被引:12
作者
Ferrigno, Robson [1 ]
Santos, Adriana [2 ]
Martins, Lidiane C. [2 ]
Weltman, Eduardo [1 ]
Chen, Michael J. [1 ]
Sakuraba, Roberto [3 ]
Lopes, Cleverson P. [3 ]
Cruz, Jose C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Israelita Albert Einstein, Dept Radiat Oncol, BR-05651901 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Hosp Israelita Albert Einstein, Serv Dosimetry, BR-05651901 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Hosp Israelita Albert Einstein, Dept Med Phys, BR-05651901 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
ACUTE HEMATOLOGIC TOXICITY; ADVANCED RECTAL-CANCER; CONCURRENT CISPLATIN; UTERINE CERVIX; BONE-MARROW; RADIOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA; IMPACT; WOMEN; IRRADIATION;
D O I
10.1186/1748-717X-5-117
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: This retrospective analysis reports on the comparative outcome of acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities between conformal radiation therapy (CRT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques in the treatment of patients with pelvic tumors. Methods: From January 2002 to December 2008, 69 patients with pelvic tumors underwent whole pelvic CRT and 65 underwent whole pelvic IMRT to treat pelvic lymph nodes and primary tumor regions. Total dose to the whole pelvis ranged from 50 to 50.4 Gy in 25 to 28 daily fractions. Chemotherapy (CT) regimen, when employed, was based upon primary tumor. Acute GI and GU toxicities were graded by RTOG/EORTC acute radiation morbidity criteria. Results: Absence of GI symptoms during radiotherapy (grade 0) was more frequently observed in the IMRT group (43.1% versus 8.7; p < 0.001) and medication for diarrhea (Grade 2) was more frequently used in the CRT group (65.2% versus 38.5%; p = 0.002). Acute GI grade 1 and 3 side effects incidence was similar in both groups (18.5% versus 18.8%; p = 0.95 and 0% versus 7.2%; p = 0.058, respectively). Incidence of GU toxicity was similar in both groups (grade 0: 61.5% versus 66.6%, p = 0.54; grade 1: 20% versus 8.7%, p = 0.06; grade 2: 18.5% versus 23.5%, p = 0.50 and grade 3: 0% versus 1.5%, p > 0.99). Conclusions: This comparative case series shows less grade 2 acute GI toxicity in patients treated with whole pelvic IMRT in comparison with those treated with CRT. Incidence of acute GU toxicity was similar in both groups.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[11]   Feasibility of dose escalation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy in posthysterectomy cervical carcinoma [J].
D'Souza, WD ;
Ahamad, AA ;
Iyer, RB ;
Salehpour, MR ;
Jhingran, A ;
Eifel, PJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (04) :1062-1070
[12]   PREOPERATIVE HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY AND MEGAVOLTAGE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR RECTAL CANCER: IMPACT ON THE IRRADIATED VOLUME OF SMALL BOWEL [J].
Engels, Benedikt ;
De Ridder, Mark ;
Tournel, Koen ;
Sermeus, Alexandra ;
De Coninck, Peter ;
Verellen, Dirk ;
Storme, Guy A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 74 (05) :1476-1480
[13]  
FERRIGNO R, 2009, P 49 ASTRO ANN M CHI
[14]   Potential advantages of intensity-modulated radiation therapy in gynecologic malignancies [J].
Jhingran, Anuja .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2006, 16 (03) :144-151
[15]   Intensity-modulated radiotherapy as a means of reducing dose to bone marrow in gynecologic patients receiving whole pelvic radiotherapy [J].
Lujan, AE ;
Mundt, AJ ;
Yamada, SD ;
Rotmensch, J ;
Roeske, JC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (02) :516-521
[16]   Dosimetric comparison of bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional techniques for treatment of cervical cancer [J].
Mell, Loren K. ;
Tiryaki, Hanfi ;
Ahn, Kang-Hyun ;
Mundt, Arno J. ;
Roeske, John C. ;
Aydogan, Bulent .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 71 (05) :1504-1510
[17]   Dosimetric predictors of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent cisplatin and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy [J].
Mell, Loren K. ;
Kochanski, Joel D. ;
Roeske, John C. ;
Haslam, Josh J. ;
Mehta, Neil ;
Yamada, S. Diane ;
Hurteau, Jean A. ;
Collins, Yvonne C. ;
Lengyel, Ernst ;
Mundt, Arno J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (05) :1356-1365
[18]   Optimal organ-sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) regimen for the treatment of locally advanced anal canal carcinoma: a comparison of conventional and IMRT plans [J].
Menkarios, Cathy ;
Azria, David ;
Laliberte, Benoit ;
Moscardo, Carmen Llacer ;
Gourgou, Sophie ;
Lemanski, Claire ;
Dubois, Jean-Bernard ;
Ailleres, Norbert ;
Fenoglietto, Pascal .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2007, 2 (1)
[19]   Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of anal cancer: Toxicity and clinical outcome [J].
Milano, MT ;
Jani, AB ;
Farrey, KJ ;
Rash, C ;
Heimann, R ;
Chmura, SJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (02) :354-361
[20]   Preliminary analysis of chronic gastrointestinal toxicity in gynecology patients treated with intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiation therapy [J].
Mundt, AJ ;
Mell, LK ;
Roeske, JC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (05) :1354-1360