Clinical validation of high-resolution fast spin-echo MR colonography after colon distention with air

被引:14
作者
Bielen, DJLE
Bosmans, HTC
De Wever, LLI
Maes, F
Tejpar, S
Vanbeckevoort, D
Marchal, GJF
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Radiol, ESAT,PSI, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Gastroenterol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
virtual colonoscopy; MR colonography; magnetic resonance imaging; colorectal cancer; screening;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.20397
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
To evaluate the feasibility of MR colonography (MRC) with air using two-dimensional (2D)) T1-weighted fast spin-echo (T1wFSE) in patients scheduled for conventional colonoscopy (CC) after classic bowel preparation, and assess the ability of the technique to detect colonic lesions. The distention was sufficient for diagnosis, and the technique provided adequate delineation of the wall in the majority of segments. Residual fluid obscured the wall in different segments, especially in the ascending and descending colon (supine position) and in the cecum, transverse, and sigmoid colon (prone position). These findings were consistent with CT colonography. MRC visualized three lesions, missed one lesion >10 mm, visualized none of four lesions <5 mm, and yielded one false-positive lesion (5-10 mm). Missed lesions can be due to inconsistency in the slice positions between consecutive breath-holds, which is inherent to the multishot technique. Residual fluid may have obscured the smaller lesions. The shortcomings of the technique are limited coverage and signal drop-off at the borders of the field of view (FOV). Before multishot 2D TlwFSE colonography can become a valid screening method, improved patient preparation and a more practical technique are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:400 / 405
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
MR colonography: How does air compare to water for colonic distention? [J].
Ajaj, W ;
Lauenstein, TC ;
Pelster, G ;
Goehde, SC ;
Debatin, JF ;
Ruehm, SG .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2004, 19 (02) :216-221
[2]
Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology [J].
Ajaj, W ;
Pelster, G ;
Treichel, U ;
Vogt, FM ;
Debatin, JF ;
Ruehm, SG ;
Lauenstein, TC .
GUT, 2003, 52 (12) :1738-1743
[3]
Dry preparation for virtual CT colonography with fecal tagging using water-soluble contrast medium: initial results [J].
Bielen, D ;
Thomeer, M ;
Vanbeckevoort, D ;
Kiss, G ;
Maes, F ;
Marchal, G ;
Rutgeerts, P .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (03) :453-458
[4]
BOSMANS H, 2002, P 10 ANN M ISMRM HON
[5]
Clinical results by CT colonoscopy [J].
Bruzzi, JF ;
Moss, AC ;
Fenlon, HM .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (11) :2188-2194
[6]
CT colonography without cathartic preparation: Feasibility study [J].
Callstrom, MR ;
Johnson, CD ;
Fletcher, JG ;
Reed, JE ;
Ahlquist, DA ;
Harmsen, WS ;
Tait, K ;
Wilson, LA ;
Corcoran, KE .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (03) :693-698
[7]
Multi-slice CT-colonography in low-dose technique -: Preliminary results [J].
Cohnen, M ;
Vogt, C ;
Aurich, V ;
Beck, A ;
Häussinger, D ;
Mödder, U .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2002, 174 (07) :835-838
[8]
Debatin JF, 2003, GUT, V52, P17
[9]
Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: Initial results-polyp detection and patient acceptance [J].
Lefere, PA ;
Gryspeerdt, SS ;
Dewyspelaere, J ;
Baekelandt, M ;
Van Holsbeeck, BG .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (02) :393-403
[10]
Magnetic resonance colonography in the detection of colonic neoplasm in high-risk and average-risk individuals [J].
Leung, WK ;
Lam, WWM ;
Wu, JCY ;
So, NMC ;
Fung, SSL ;
Chan, FKL ;
To, KF ;
Yeung, DTK ;
Sung, JJY .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (01) :102-108