Surface visualization at CT colonography simulated colonoscopy: Effect of varying field of view and retrograde view

被引:78
作者
East, James E.
Saunders, Brian P.
Burling, David
Boone, Darren
Halligan, Steve
Taylor, Stuart A.
机构
[1] St Marks Hosp, Wolfson Unit Endoscopy, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
[2] St Marks Hosp, Intestinal Imaging Ctr, Harrow, Middx, England
[3] UCL Hosp, Dept Specialist Radiol, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01429.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Colonoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis of mucosal disease, but has a recognized "miss rate" for polyps probably because some lesions lie in areas of the colonic surface that do not enter the field of view. Using CT colonography (CTC) simulation this pilot study aimed to determine how much colonic surface is visualized with a standard, modern optical colonoscope (field of view 140 degrees) with or without the addition of a retrograde viewing auxiliary imaging device (RVAID; 135 degrees) and of a wide-angle (170 degrees) colonoscope. Methods: Supine CTC datasets for 20 patients were reviewed with customized CTC software that calculated the percentage of colonic surface seen and number and area of nonvisualized "missed" areas at a unidirectional three-dimensional (3D) endoluminal flythrough, approximating the view obtained at optical colonoscopy. The field of view could be varied from 0-180 degrees. The combination of a colonoscope with RVAID was simulated by an additional flythrough facing the rectum. Results: Mean colonic surface area was 2,743 +/- 759 cm(2). Percentage colonic surface visualized at simulated optical colonoscopy with a 90 degrees, 140 degrees, and 170 degrees field of view was 68.0 +/- 5.2%, 86.6 +/- 3.3%, and 92.2 +/- 3.3%, respectively, P < 0.001. Simulation of a 140 degrees colonoscope with an RVAID resulted in almost complete surface visualization, 98.7 +/- 0.5%, with total missed area reduced 10-fold compared with a 170 degrees colonoscope, P < 0.001. Conclusion: CTC simulated 140 degrees optical colonoscopy visualizes over 85% of the colonic surface. 170 degrees colonoscopy provides a modest reduction in missed surface and the simulated addition of RVAIDs appears beneficial.
引用
收藏
页码:2529 / 2535
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [11] Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates
    Harrison, M
    Singh, N
    Rex, DK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (03) : 519 - 522
  • [12] Okada S, 2006, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V130, pA196
  • [13] Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy
    Pickhardt, PJ
    Nugent, PA
    Mysliwiec, PA
    Choi, JR
    Schindler, WR
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (05) : 352 - 359
  • [14] Surface visualization at 3D endoluminal CT colonography: Degree of coverage and implications for polyp detection
    Pickhardt, PJ
    Taylor, AJ
    Gopal, DV
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 130 (06) : 1582 - 1587
  • [15] Postic G, 2002, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V97, P3182
  • [16] Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: Impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies
    Rex, DK
    Chadalawada, V
    Helper, DJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (09) : 2000 - 2005
  • [17] Accessing proximal aspects of folds and flexures during colonoscopy: Impact of a pediatric colonoscope with a short bending section
    Rex, DK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (07) : 1504 - 1507
  • [18] Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates
    Rex, DK
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (01) : 33 - 36
  • [19] Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance
    Robertson, DJ
    Greenberg, ER
    Beach, M
    Sandler, RS
    Ahnen, D
    Haile, RW
    Burke, CA
    Snover, DC
    Bresalier, RS
    McKeown-Eyssen, G
    Mandel, JS
    Bond, JH
    Van Stolk, RU
    Summers, RW
    Rothstein, R
    Church, TR
    Cole, BF
    Byers, T
    Mott, L
    Baron, JA
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 129 (01) : 34 - 41
  • [20] Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for CT colonography
    Shinners, TJ
    Pickhardt, PJ
    Taylor, AJ
    Jones, DA
    Olsen, CH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 186 (06) : 1491 - 1496