The assessment of workaholism as behavioral tendencies: Scale development and preliminary empirical testing

被引:50
作者
Mudrack, PE
Naughton, TJ
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Management, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Dept Management & Org Sci, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[3] Kansas State Univ, Dept Management, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
关键词
workaholism; scale development; construct validity;
D O I
10.1023/A:1009525213213
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This article reports on the development and preliminary empirical testing of two new scales designed to assess workaholic behavioral patterns. One scale assessed employee tendencies to perform nonrequired work (typically, spending time thinking of ways to perform work better), and the other measured tendencies to intrude on and attempt to control the work of others. These scales seem consistent with both conceptual definitions and anecdotal accounts of workaholism. Moreover, the scales were designed to assess behavioral tendencies rather than work attitudes, to circumvent the possibility of rationalization and denial among workaholic respondents, and to be applicable across multiple work contexts. Evidence from a sample of 278 employed respondents indicated that the scales were internally consistent, and represented distinct constructs. The scales also demonstrated evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. For example, scores on the nonrequired work scale correlated positively with hours worked and with the needs for achievement, autonomy, and affiliation. Scores on the control of others scale correlated positively with job involvement, stress, work-nonwork conflict, role conflict, dominance needs, and self-monitoring, In summary, the workaholism scales developed for this investigation appear both reliable and valid and thus potentially able to shed light on the phenomenon of workaholism.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 111
页数:19
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   FACTOR-ANALYSIS AND AIC [J].
AKAIKE, H .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1987, 52 (03) :317-332
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, LISREL 6 ANAL LINEAR
[3]   A NEW INCREMENTAL FIT INDEX FOR GENERAL STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS [J].
BOLLEN, KA .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1989, 17 (03) :303-316
[4]   THE ROLE OF FACTOR-ANALYSIS IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF PERSONALITY-SCALES [J].
BRIGGS, SR ;
CHEEK, JM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1986, 54 (01) :106-148
[5]  
Browne M. W., 1993, TESTING STRUCTURAL E, P136, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005, 10.1177/0049124192021002005]
[6]  
Burke RJ, 2000, STRESS MEDICINE, V16, P11, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1700(200001)16:1<11::AID-SMI825>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-U
[8]   It's not how hard you work but how you work hard: Evaluating workaholism components [J].
Burke, RJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRESS MANAGEMENT, 1999, 6 (04) :225-239
[9]   Workaholism in organizations: Measurement validation and replication [J].
Burke, RJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRESS MANAGEMENT, 1999, 6 (01) :45-55
[10]   AN EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN WORK COMMITMENT AND NONWORK DOMAINS [J].
COHEN, A .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1995, 48 (03) :239-263