Measurement equivalence of Watson and Clark's 18 surrogate measures of negative affectivity: applying the principle of tetrad differences to an incomplete correlation matrix

被引:3
作者
Viswesvaran, C [1 ]
Sanchez, JI [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida Int Univ, Dept Psychol, Miami, FL 33199 USA
关键词
negative affectivity; correlation matrix; personality measures;
D O I
10.1080/02678379708252999
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Watson and Clark concluded, based primarily on a subjective analysis of the positive manifold of 87 intercorrelations, that 18 personality measures were manifestations of the same stable and pervasive trait of negative affectivity. Confirmatory factor analysis to test a one-factor measurement model was not possible, since only an incomplete matrix of correlations (87 out of 153) was available. In this paper, the principle of tetrad differences was applied to an incomplete correlation matrix to test for a general factor across the 18 measures. This principle assesses the equivalence of different measures hypothesized to tap into the same construct. Of the 614 first-order partial correlations, only 44 (7.2 %) failed to satisfy the principle of tetrad differences, indicating support for a common underlying trait. In addition, confirmatory factor analysis and Herman's one-factor test provided support for a general factor across a subset of the 18 scales for which a complete matrix of correlations was available.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 368
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   THE ROLE OF NEGATIVE AFFECTIVITY IN UNDERSTANDING RELATIONS BETWEEN SELF-REPORTS OF STRESSORS AND STRAINS - A COMMENT ON THE APPLIED-PSYCHOLOGY LITERATURE [J].
BURKE, MJ ;
BRIEF, AP ;
GEORGE, JM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (03) :402-412
[2]   NEGATIVE AFFECTIVITY AS THE UNDERLYING CAUSE OF CORRELATIONS BETWEEN STRESSORS AND STRAINS [J].
CHEN, PY ;
SPECTOR, PE .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 76 (03) :398-407
[3]   STRESS, SOCIAL SUPPORT, AND THE BUFFERING HYPOTHESIS [J].
COHEN, S ;
WILLS, TA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1985, 98 (02) :310-357
[4]   A META-ANALYSIS OF THE CORRELATES OF ROLE-CONFLICT AND AMBIGUITY [J].
FISHER, CD ;
GITELSON, R .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 68 (02) :320-333
[5]  
HEINISCH DA, 1994, 9 ANN M SOC IND ORG
[6]   A META-ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTUAL CRITIQUE OF RESEARCH ON ROLE AMBIGUITY AND ROLE-CONFLICT IN WORK SETTINGS [J].
JACKSON, SE ;
SCHULER, RS .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1985, 36 (01) :16-78
[7]  
Joreskog K. G., 1985, LISREL 6 ANAL LINEAR
[8]  
SANCHEZ JI, 1995, ACAD MANAGE J, V38, P504, DOI 10.5465/256690
[9]   "General intelligence " objectively determined and measured [J].
Spearman, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1904, 15 :201-292
[10]  
Stone E. F., 1989, IMPRESSION MANAGEMEN, P189