Spelling-sound typicality only affects words with digraphs: Further qualifications to the generality of the regularity effect on word naming

被引:12
作者
Andrews, S [1 ]
Woollams, A
Bond, R
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] MRC, Cognit & Brain Sci Unit, Cambridge CB2 2EF, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
lexical retrieval; regularity; consistency; graphemic complexity;
D O I
10.1016/j.jml.2005.04.002
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 [人类学]; 0501 [中国语言文学]; 050102 [语言学及应用语言学];
摘要
Two experiments investigated naming performance for items with and without digraphs. Both experiments compared performance for Regular Consistent, Regular Inconsistent and Exception words. Experiment I also compared nonwords with Non-Existent Bodies to those with existing Consistent and Inconsistent Bodies. Naming was slower for nonwords containing digraphs and for nonwords constructed from Non-Existent bodies. In both experiments, the naming latency data for words showed effects of spelling-sound typicality only for words with digraphs; the speed of naming words without digraphs was not affected by either regularity or consistency. The complete set of results could not be effectively simulated by either the Dual-Route Cascaded model or by Plant, McClelland, Seidenberg, and Patterson's (1996) Parallel Distributed Processing models. The absence of effects of spelling-sound typicality for words without digraphs qualifies a phenomenon that has been regarded as one of the central facts of visual word recognition and provides strong constraints on the future development of computational models of lexical retrieval. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 593
页数:27
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]
The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts [J].
Andrews, S .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1997, 4 (04) :439-461
[2]
Interactive activation accounts of morphological decomposition: Finding the trap in mousetrap? [J].
Andrews, S ;
Davis, C .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1999, 68 (1-2) :355-361
[3]
PHONOLOGICAL RECODING - IS THE REGULARITY EFFECT CONSISTENT [J].
ANDREWS, S .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1982, 10 (06) :565-575
[4]
Rule and analogy mechanisms in reading nonwords: Hough Dou Peapel Rede Gnew Wirds? [J].
Andrews, S ;
Scarratt, DR .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1998, 24 (04) :1052-1086
[5]
THE LOCUS OF WORD-FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN THE PRONUNCIATION TASK - LEXICAL ACCESS AND OR PRODUCTION [J].
BALOTA, DA ;
CHUMBLEY, JI .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1985, 24 (01) :89-106
[6]
USE OF ORTHOGRAPHIC AND WORD SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE IN READING WORDS ALOUD [J].
BARON, J ;
STRAWSON, C .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1976, 2 (03) :386-393
[7]
FUNCTIONAL PRONUNCIATION UNITS IN ENGLISH WORDS [J].
BERNDT, RS ;
DAUTRECHY, CL ;
REGGIA, JA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1994, 20 (04) :977-991
[8]
ON THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN CONNECTIONISM AND DATA - ARE A FEW WORDS NECESSARY [J].
BESNER, D ;
TWILLEY, L ;
MCCANN, RS ;
SEERGOBIN, K .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1990, 97 (03) :432-446
[9]
THE STRUCTURE OF GRAPHEMIC REPRESENTATIONS [J].
CARAMAZZA, A ;
MICELI, G .
COGNITION, 1990, 37 (03) :243-297
[10]
DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud [J].
Coltheart, M ;
Rastle, K ;
Perry, C ;
Langdon, R ;
Ziegler, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (01) :204-256