The life cycle of scholars and papers in economics - the 'citation death tax'
被引:12
作者:
Aizenman, Joshua
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Econ, UCSC, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Natl Bur Econ Res, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USAUniv Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Econ, UCSC, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
Aizenman, Joshua
[1
,2
]
Kletzer, Kenneth
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Econ, UCSC, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
Kletzer, Kenneth
机构:
[1] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Econ, UCSC, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Natl Bur Econ Res, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
The information content of academic citations is a subject to debate. This article views premature death as a tragic 'natural experiment', outlining a methodology identifying the 'citation death tax' - the impact of the death of productive economists on the patterns of their citations. We rely on a sample of 428 papers written by 16 well-known economists who died well before retirement, during the period 1975 to 1997. The news is mixed: for half of the sample, we identify a large and significant 'citation death tax' for the average paper written by these scholars. For these authors, the estimated average missing citations per paper attributed to premature death ranges from 40% to 140% (the overall average is about 90%), and the annual costs of lost citations per paper are in the range 3-14%. Hence, a paper written 10 years before the author's death avoids a citation cost that varies between 30% and 140%. For the other half of the sample, there is no citation death tax; and for two Nobel Prize-calibre scholars in this second group, Black and Tversky, citations took off over time, reflecting the growing recognitions of their seminal works.