Management evaluation of Water Users Associations using benchmarking techniques

被引：59

作者：

Corcoles, J. I. ^{[1
]}

de Juan, J. A. ^{[1
]}

Ortega, J. F. ^{[1
]}

Tarjuelo, J. M. ^{[1
]}

Moreno, M. A. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Ctr Reg Estudios Agua, Albacete 02071, Spain

来源：

AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT | 2010年 / 98卷 / 01期

关键词：

Performance indicators; Benchmarking; Water Users Associations; Water and energy management; IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY; MANCHA; TOOL;

D O I：

10.1016/j.agwat.2010.07.018

中图分类号：

S3 [农学（农艺学）];

学科分类号：

0901 ;

摘要：

The development of different tools to evaluate the performance of Water Users Associations (WUAs) is an important practice for improving water and energy management together with other production costs One of these tools is the Benchmarkmg technique which is based on the comparison between different WUAs to determine the best practices in each of them In this paper a Benchmarking process is applied to seven WUAs located in Castilla-La Mancha (Spain) during three inigation seasons (2006-2008) The performance indicators developed by the International Programme for Technology and Research in Irrigation and Drainage (IPTRID) are used while new indicators dealing with production and energy are proposed The goals of this paper are to group WUAs with the same characteristics using performance and energy indicators and to reduce the set of indicators using statistical methods The most Important indicators easy to obtain and yielding result in maximum information are retained for further use Three proposals reducing the initial number of indicators were proposed with an aim of being useful for future applications based on characterizing WUAs Indicators results highlighted that irrigable areas can be grouped based on the application of drip irrigation systems and those with sprinkler irrigation systems When using groundwater resources no significant differences were observed for energy consumption between these irrigation systems This can be explained by the indicator energy load index (ICE m) which had similar values in all WUAs analyzed According to annual irrigation water supply per unit irrigated area (VTSr m(3) ha(-1)) the highest values (between 5200 m3 ha-1 and 6800 m3 ha-1) were obtained in WUAs with sprinkler irrigation systems which contained crops characterized by high water requirements compared to the VTSr (less than 1800 m(3) ha-1) of WUAs with drip irrigation systems with crops that required less volume of irrigation water Regarding production efficiency indicators in drip irrigation systems the high presence of vineyards almond and olive trees crops with low water requirements explained high values of gross margin per unit irrigation delivery (MBVs is an element of m(-3))(close to 0 82 is an element of m(-3)) in comparison with sprinkler irrigation systems (close to 0 36 m-3) (c) 2010 Elsevier B V All rights reserved

引用

页码：1 / 11

页数：11

共 45 条

[11]

Bos M.G., 1994, IRRIG DRAIN, V4, P345

[12]

Buit CM, 1999, MODERN WATER CONTROL

[13]

Cakmak B, 2004, IRRIG DRAIN ENG, V53, P155

[14]

Carnacho E, 2006, 24 C NAC RIEG AERYD

[15]

Carnacho E, 2007, RIEGOS DRENAJES 21, V152, P36

[16] Bayesian networks in planning a large aquifer in Eastern Mancha, Spain [J].

de Santa Olalla, Francisco Martin ;

Dominguez, Alfonso ;

Ortega, Fernando ;

Artigao, Alfonso ;

Fabeiro, Concepcion .

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2007, 22 (08) :1089-1100

[17]

Degirmenci Hasan, 2003, Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, V27, P293

[18] Management trends and responses to water scarcity in an irrigation scheme of Southern Spain [J].

Garcia-Vila, M. ;

Lorite, I. J. ;

Soriano, M. A. ;

Fereres, E. .

AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2008, 95 (04) :458-468

[19] Benchmarking of irrigation projects in Malaysia: Initial implementation stages and preliminary results [J].

Ghazalli, MA .

IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2004, 53 (02) :195-212

[20]

Haan C.T., 2002, STAT METHODS HYDROLO

← 1 2 3 4 5 →