Psychometric properties of the neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with mechanical neck pain

被引:516
作者
Cleland, Joshua A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Childs, John A. [4 ]
Whitman, Julie M. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Franklin Pierce Coll, Phys Therapy Program, Concord, NH 03301 USA
[2] Concord Hosp, Rehabil Serv, Concord, NH USA
[3] Regis Univ, Manual Therapy Fellowship Program, Denver, CO USA
[4] USA Baylor Univ, Doctoral Program Phys Therapy, San Antonio, TX USA
[5] Regis Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Denver, CO USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2008年 / 89卷 / 01期
关键词
neck; neck pain; rehabilitation;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.126
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the psychometric properties including test-retest reliability, construct validity, and minimum levels of detectable and clinically important change for the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain in a cohort of patients with neck pain. Design: Single-group repeated-measures design. Setting: Outpatient physical therapy (PT) clinics. Participants: Patients (N=137) presenting to PT with a primary report of neck pain. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: All patients completed the NDI and the NRS at the baseline examination and at a follow-up. At the time of the follow-up, all patients also completed the global rating of change, which was used to dichotomize patients as improved or stable. Baseline and follow-up scores were used to determine the test-retest reliability, construct validity, and minimal levels of detectable and clinically important change for both the NDI and NRS. Results: Test-retest reliability was calculated using an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) (NDI ICC=.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], .25-67; NRS ICC=.76; 95% CI, .51-87). The area under the curve was .83 (95% Cl, .75-90) for the NDI score and .85 (95% Cl, .78-.93) for the NRS score for determining between stable and improved patients. Thresholds for the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the NDI were 19-percentage points and 1.3 for the NRS. Conclusions: Both the NDI and NRS exhibit fair to moderate test-retest reliability in patients with mechanical neck pain. Both instruments also showed adequate responsiveness in this patient population. However, the MCID required to be certain that the change in scores has surpassed a level that could be contributed to measurement error for the NDI was twice that which has previously been reported. Therefore the ongoing analyses of the properties of the NDI in a patient population with neck pain are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 74
页数:6
相关论文
共 48 条
[31]   Responsiveness of pain, disability, and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain [J].
Pengel, LHM ;
Refshauge, KM ;
Maher, CG .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (08) :879-883
[32]   Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction - A systematic review [J].
Pietrobon, B ;
Coeytaux, RB ;
Carey, TS ;
Richardson, WJ ;
DeVellis, RF .
SPINE, 2002, 27 (05) :515-522
[33]   Use of generic versus region-specific functional status measures on patients with cervical spine disorders [J].
Riddle, DL ;
Stratford, PW .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1998, 78 (09) :951-963
[34]   The validity of prospective and retrospective global change criterion measures [J].
Schmitt, J ;
Di Fabio, RP .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2005, 86 (12) :2270-2276
[35]  
Shrout P E, 1998, Stat Methods Med Res, V7, P301, DOI 10.1191/096228098672090967
[36]   INTRACLASS CORRELATIONS - USES IN ASSESSING RATER RELIABILITY [J].
SHROUT, PE ;
FLEISS, JL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1979, 86 (02) :420-428
[37]  
Spurling R.G., 1944, SURG GYNAECOLOGY OBS, V78, P350
[38]   ASSESSING CHANGE OVER TIME IN PATIENTS WITH LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
STRATFORD, PW ;
BINKLEY, J ;
SOLOMON, P ;
GILL, C ;
FINCH, E .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1994, 74 (06) :528-533
[39]  
Stratford PW, 1998, PHYS THER, V78, P1186, DOI 10.1093/ptj/78.11.1186
[40]  
Stratford PW, 1995, Physiotherapy Canada, V47, P258, DOI [10.3138/ptc.47.4.258, DOI 10.3138/PTC.47.4.258, 10.3138/p tc.47.4.258]