Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: A reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain

被引:933
作者
Jensen, MP
Chen, C
Brugger, AM
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Ctr Multidisciplinary Pain, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Pfizer, Skokie, IL USA
关键词
pain assessment; treatment outcome; meaningful change;
D O I
10.1016/S1526-5900(03)00716-8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The visual analog scale (VAS) is one of the most commonly used measures of pain intensity in pain research. However, there remain important unanswered questions concerning interpretation of specific VAS ratings and change scores. To address these questions, we performed a reanalysis of data from 2 randomized controlled trials of postoperative pain (N = 123 and N = 125) to determine the meaning of VAS pain intensity ratings and change scores. The findings suggested that 100-mm VAS ratings of 0 to 4 mm can be considered no pain; 5 to 44 mm, mild pain; 45 to 74 mm, moderate pain; and 75 to 100 mm, severe pain. As predicted, in assessment of the amount of change corresponding to differing levels of pain relief, percentage change in a patient's VAS score was less biased by pretreatment pain than was absolute change score. The findings also suggested that a 33% decrease in pain represents a reasonable standard for determining that a change in pain is meaningful from the patient's perspective. (C) 2003 by the American Pain Society.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 414
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Dextromethorphan mitigates phantom pain in cancer amputees [J].
Abraham, RB ;
Marouani, N ;
Weinbroum, AA .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 10 (03) :268-274
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, AHCPR PUBLICATION
[3]   Efficacy and safety of intravenous parecoxib sodium in relieving acute postoperative pain following gynecologic laparotomy surgery [J].
Barton, SF ;
Langeland, FF ;
Snabes, MC ;
LeComte, D ;
Kuss, ME ;
Dhadda, SS ;
Hubbard, RC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 97 (02) :306-314
[4]   A randomized double-blind pilot study comparing Doloteffin® and Vioxx® in the treatment of low back pain [J].
Chrubasik, S ;
Model, A ;
Black, A ;
Pollak, S .
RHEUMATOLOGY, 2003, 42 (01) :141-148
[5]   Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Young, JP ;
LaMoreaux, L ;
Werth, JL ;
Poole, RM .
PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) :149-158
[6]   Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Portenoy, RK ;
Berlin, JA ;
Kinman, JL ;
Strom, BL .
PAIN, 2000, 88 (03) :287-294
[7]   Assessment of pain during medical procedures: A comparison of three scales [J].
Jensen, MP ;
Miller, L ;
Fisher, LD .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1998, 14 (04) :343-349
[8]   Pain site and the effects of amputation pain: further clarification of the meaning of mild, moderate, and severe pain [J].
Jensen, MP ;
Smith, DG ;
Ehde, DM ;
Robinsin, LR .
PAIN, 2001, 91 (03) :317-322
[9]  
Jensen MP., 2001, Handbook of pain assessment, V2nd ed, P15
[10]   ANTICONVULSANT DRUGS FOR MANAGEMENT OF PAIN - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW [J].
MCQUAY, H ;
CARROLL, D ;
JADAD, AR ;
WIFFEN, P ;
MOORE, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7012) :1047-1052