Fast rates of subduction erosion along the Costa Rica Pacific margin: Implications for nonsteady rates of crustal recycling at subduction zones

被引:107
作者
Vannucchi, P
Ranero, CR
Galeotti, S
Straub, SM
Scholl, DW
McDougall-Ried, K
机构
[1] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento Sci Terra, Modena, Italy
[2] Forschungszentrum Marine Geowissensch, Kiel, Germany
[3] Univ Kiel, Kiel, Germany
[4] Univ Urbino, Ist Geol, I-61029 Urbino, Italy
[5] Stanford Univ, Dept Geophys, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[6] US Geol Survey, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 USA
[7] US Geol Survey, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
关键词
convergent margins; tectonic erosion; Middle America Trench; Cocos Ridge;
D O I
10.1029/2002JB002207
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
[1] At least since the middle Miocene (similar to16 Ma), subduction erosion has been the dominant process controlling the tectonic evolution of the Pacific margin of Costa Rica. Ocean Drilling Program Site 1042 recovered 16.5 Ma nearshore sediment at similar to3.9 km depth, similar to7 km landward of the trench axis. The overlying Miocene to Quaternary sediment contains benthic foraminifera documenting margin subsidence from upper bathyal (similar to200 m) to abyssal (similar to2000 m) depth. The rate of subsidence was low during the early to middle Miocene but increased sharply in the late Miocene-early Pliocene (5-6.5 Ma) and at the Pliocene-Pleistocene boundary (2.4 Ma). Foraminifera data, bedding dip, and the geometry of slope sediment indicate that tilting of the forearc occurred coincident with the onset of rapid late Miocene subsidence. Seismic images show that normal faulting is widespread across the continental slope; however, extension by faulting only accounts for a minor amount of the post-6.5 Ma subsidence. Basal tectonic erosion is invoked to explain the subsidence. The short-term rate of removal of rock from the forearc is about 107-123 km(3) Myr(-1) km(-1). Mass removal is a nonsteady state process affecting the chemical balance of the arc: the ocean sediment input, with the short-term erosion rate, is a factor of 10 smaller than the eroded mass input. The low Be-10 concentration in the volcanic arc of Costa Rica could be explained by dilution with eroded material. The late Miocene onset of rapid subsidence is coeval with the arrival of the Cocos Ridge at the subduction zone. The underthrusting of thick and thermally younger ocean crust decreased the subduction angle of the slab along a large segment of the margin and changed the dynamic equilibrium of the margin taper. This process may have induced the increase in the rate of subduction erosion and thus the recycling of crustal material to the mantle.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 69 条
[11]   Structure of the Costa Rica convergent margin, offshore Nicoya Peninsula [J].
Christeson, GL ;
McIntosh, KD ;
Shipley, TH ;
Flueh, ER ;
Goedde, H .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1999, 104 (B11) :25443-25468
[12]  
Clift PD, 1999, GEOLOGY, V27, P411, DOI 10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0411:SROSEE>2.3.CO
[13]  
2
[14]   Tectonic erosion of the Peruvian forearc, Lima Basin, by subduction and Nazca Ridge collision [J].
Clift, PD ;
Pecher, I ;
Kukowski, N ;
Hampel, A .
TECTONICS, 2003, 22 (03) :7-1
[15]   CURRENT PLATE MOTIONS [J].
DEMETS, C ;
GORDON, RG ;
ARGUS, DF ;
STEIN, S .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 1990, 101 (02) :425-478
[16]   A new estimate for present-day Cocos-Caribbean plate motion: Implications for slip along the Central American volcanic arc [J].
DeMets, C .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2001, 28 (21) :4043-4046
[17]   Deformation of accretionary wedges in response to seamount subduction: Insights from sandbox experiments [J].
Dominguez, S ;
Malavieille, J ;
Lallemand, SE .
TECTONICS, 2000, 19 (01) :182-196
[18]   IGNEOUS PETROGENESIS AND TECTONIC SETTING OF PLUTONIC AND VOLCANIC-ROCKS OF THE CORDILLERA DE TALAMANCA, COSTA-RICA PANAMA, CENTRAL-AMERICAN ARC [J].
DRUMMOND, MS ;
BORDELON, M ;
DEBOER, JZ ;
DEFANT, MJ ;
BELLON, H ;
FEIGENSON, MD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 1995, 295 (07) :875-919
[19]  
GANS PB, 2002, 2002 ANN M EOL SOC A
[20]  
Gardner T, 2001, GEOLOGY, V29, P151, DOI 10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0151:HFBRIR>2.0.CO