Efficacy and safety of donepezil over 3 years: an open-label, multicentre study in patients with Alzheimer's disease

被引:46
作者
Burns, A. [1 ]
Gauthier, S.
Perdomo, C.
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Educ & Res Ctr, Wythenshawe Hosp, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
ADAS-cog; Alzheimer's disease; CDR-SB; donepezil; long term treatment;
D O I
10.1002/gps.1746
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective This 132-week, open-label extension study assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of donepezil in 579 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) who had previously participated in a 24-week double-blind study of 5 or 10 mg/day donepezil vs placebo. Method Patients enrolled in the present study had a 6-week single-blind placebo washout period followed by treatment with donepezil 5 mg/day for 6 weeks with an optional increase in dosage to 10 mg/day between weeks 6 and 32. Results After 6 weeks of open-label treatment with donepezil 5 mg/day, mean Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale scores (ADAS-cog) improved by approximately two points, while after 12 weeks of open-label treatment (with a majority of patients receiving 10 mg/day), the mean ADAS-cog score was I point better than the score at the end of the placebo washout period. Scores then declined gradually over the remainder of the study. Mean changes in Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes scores showed slight improvement over the first 12 weeks of open-label treatment and then slowly declined for the remainder of the study period. Donepezil was well tolerated over the entire 162-week study period. Overall, 85% of patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE). The most common included diarrhoea (12%), nausea (11%), infection (11%) and accidental injury (10%). Some patients discontinued the study due to AEs (15%). Conclusions These results support the conclusion that donepezil is safe and effective for the long-term treatment of patients with mild to moderate AD. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:806 / 812
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   A 1-year, placebo-controlled preservation of function survival study of donepezil in AD patients [J].
Mohs, RC ;
Doody, RS ;
Morris, JC ;
Ieni, JR ;
Rogers, SL ;
Perdomo, CA ;
Pratt, RD .
NEUROLOGY, 2001, 57 (03) :481-488
[12]  
*NAT I CLIN EXC, APPR CONS DOC ALZH D
[13]   Cognitive, global, and functional benefits of donepezil in Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia: results from large-scale clinical trials [J].
Passmore, AP ;
Bayer, AJ ;
Steinhagen-Thiessen, E .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 229 :141-146
[14]   Clinical pharmacology of anti-Alzheimer drugs [J].
Pettenati, C ;
Annicchiarico, R ;
Caltagirone, C .
FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 17 (06) :659-672
[15]   Long-term efficacy and safety of donepezil in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: final analysis of a US multicentre open-label study [J].
Rogers, SL ;
Doody, RS ;
Pratt, RD ;
Ieni, JR .
EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 10 (03) :195-203
[16]   A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer's disease [J].
Rogers, SL ;
Farlow, MR ;
Doody, RS ;
Mohs, R ;
Friedhoff, LT ;
Albala, B ;
Baumel, B ;
Booker, G ;
Dexter, J ;
Farmer, M ;
Feighner, JP ;
Ferris, S ;
Gordon, B ;
Gorman, DG ;
Hanna, G ;
Harrell, LE ;
Hubbard, R ;
Kennedy, J ;
McCarthy, J ;
Scharre, DW ;
Schaerf, F ;
Schneider, L ;
Seltzer, B ;
Siegal, A ;
Stark, SR ;
Strauss, A ;
Walshe, TM .
NEUROLOGY, 1998, 50 (01) :136-145
[17]   Donepezil improves cognition and global function in Alzheimer disease - A 15-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [J].
Rogers, SL ;
Doody, RS ;
Mohs, RC ;
Friedhoff, LT .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (09) :1021-1031
[18]  
ROSEN WG, 1984, AM J PSYCHIAT, V141, P1356
[19]  
SCHWALEN S, 2003, FOUR YEAR TREATMENT
[20]   Cognitive performance in Alzheimer's disease patients receiving rivastigmine for up to 5 years [J].
Small, GW ;
Kaufer, D ;
Mendiondo, MS ;
Quarg, P ;
Spiegel, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2005, 59 (04) :473-477