Cabergoline in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease: Results of the first year of treatment in a double-blind comparison of cabergoline and levodopa

Cabergoline is a potent D-2 receptor agonist with a half-life of 65 hours that may provide continuous dopaminergic stimulation administered once daily. In this study, we randomized de novo Parkinson's disease (PD) patients to treatment with increasing doses of cabergoline (0.25 to 4 mg/d) or levodopa (100 to 600 mg/d) up to the optimal or maximum tolerated dose. Decreases of >30% in motor disability (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Factor III) versus baseline were considered indicative of clinical improvement. If 30% improvement was not achieved, levodopa/ carbidopa could be added on an open basis, Of the 208 patients entered in the cabergoline group, 175 remained in the study for 1 year at a mean dose of 2.8 mg/d; in the levodopa group, 176 of the 205 patients entered were still on study after 1 year at a mean dose of 468 mg/d. The proportion of patients requiring additional levodopa/carbidopa increased in the cabergoline group from 18% at 6 months to 38% at 1 year versus 10% (p = 0.05) at 6 months and 18% (p < 0.01) at 1 year in the levodopa group. The proportion of patients showing clinical improvement did not differ significantly between the two groups, or between the subgroups on monotherapy, at any endpoint, Irrespective of levodopa/carbidopa addition, 81% of patients in the cabergoline group and 87% of patients in the levodopa group were clinically improved at 1 year (p = 0.189); the corresponding figures for the subgroup on monotherapy were 79% in the cabergoline-treated patients and 86% in the levodopa-treated patients (p = 0.199). The mean difference versus baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Factor III scores in patients who remained on monotherapy up to 1 year was 12.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.8, 14.3) in the cabergoline group and 16.4 (95% CI: 14.8, 18.0) in the levodopa group. Adverse events occurred in 76% of patients on cabergoline and in 66% of patients on levodopa. The severity profile for reported events was similar for the two agents. The results of this study indicate that cabergoline treatment for up to 1 year is only marginally less effective than levodopa in the proportion of patients who can be treated in monotherapy. More than 60% of de novo PD patients could be managed on cabergoline alone up to 1 year, In the patients in whom levodopa/carbidopa was needed, the combination therapy provided efficacy similar to that obtained with levodopa alone, with a relevant sparing of levodopa.