Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Biobanks for Genetics Research

被引:91
作者
Haga, Susanne B. [1 ]
Beskow, Laura M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Ctr Genome Eth Law & Policy, Inst Genome Sci & Policy, Durham, NC 27708 USA
来源
GENETIC DISSECTION OF COMPLEX TRAITS, 2ND EDITION | 2008年 / 60卷
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0065-2660(07)00418-X
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The elucidation of the causes of complex diseases pivots on understanding the interaction between biological (genetic) and environmental factors that give rise to disease risk. The modest effects of genetic factors in complex diseases supports the need for large-scale studies of high-quality human biological materials, paired with detailed clinical data, to adequately detect these effects. To this end, biobanks or biorepositories have been developed around the world, by public and private entities alike, to provide researchers the opportunity to study collections of human biospecimens annotated with clinical and other health-related measurements. It has been estimated that more than 270 million tissue samples are stored in the U.S., expanding at a rate of similar to 20 million samples annually. In this chapter, we discuss several ethical, legal, and social issues that have been raised surrounding biobanks, including recruitment of vulnerable populations, informed consent, data disclosure to participants, intellectual property, and privacy and security. Throughout the chapter, we will highlight experiences of national biobanks in Iceland, the U.K., Sweden, and Estonia, and the proposal for a U. S. population cohort study. The dependence on public participation requires clear and transparent policies developed through inclusive processes. (C) 2008, Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / 544
页数:40
相关论文
共 121 条
[61]  
*IND PEOPL COUNC B, 1997, UK DECL KUN YAL HUM
[62]   Implications of small effect sizes of individual genetic variants on the design and interpretation of genetic association studies of complex diseases [J].
Ioannidis, John P. A. ;
Trikalinos, Thomas A. ;
Khoury, Muin J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 164 (07) :609-614
[63]   Replication validity of genetic association studies [J].
Ioannidis, JPA ;
Ntzani, EE ;
Trikalinos, TA ;
Contopoulos-Ioannidis, DG .
NATURE GENETICS, 2001, 29 (03) :306-309
[64]   Why surgical patients do not donate tissue for commercial research: review of records [J].
Jack, AL ;
Womack, C .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7409) :262-262
[65]   Genetic information, privacy and insolvency [J].
Janger, EJ .
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2005, 33 (01) :79-+
[66]   Group identity and human diversity: Keeping biology straight from culture [J].
Juengst, ET .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1998, 63 (03) :673-677
[67]   Groups as gatekeepers to genomic research: Conceptually confusing, morally hazardous, and practically useless [J].
Juengst, ET .
KENNEDY INSTITUTE OF ETHICS JOURNAL, 1998, 8 (02) :183-200
[68]   Genomic medicine - African-American population biobank proposed [J].
Kaiser, J .
SCIENCE, 2003, 300 (5625) :1485-1485
[69]   Views of female breast cancer patients who donated biologic samples regarding storage and use of samples for genetic research [J].
Kaphingst, KA ;
Janoff, JM ;
Harris, LN ;
Emmons, KM .
CLINICAL GENETICS, 2006, 69 (05) :393-398
[70]   Do we need a uniform regulatory system for biobanks across Europe? [J].
Kaye, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2006, 14 (02) :245-248