Evaluation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol: the Omron M5-I and the Omron 705IT

被引:207
作者
El Assaad, MA [1 ]
Topouchian, JA [1 ]
Asmar, RG [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiovasc Inst, F-75016 Paris, France
关键词
Omron; blood pressure; validation; international protocol;
D O I
10.1097/00126097-200306000-00006
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100210 [外科学];
摘要
Background Two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure at the brachial artery-the Omron M5-I and the Omron 705IT-were evaluated according to the international protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. Design The international validation protocol is divided into two phases: the first phase is performed on 15 selected subjects and if the device passes this phase, 18 supplementary subjects are included making a total number of 33 subjects on which the final validation is performed. Methods For each subject, four blood pressure (BP) measurements were performed simultaneously by two trained observers using mercury sphygmomanometers alternately with three measurements by the tested device. The difference between the BP value given by the device and that obtained by the two observers (mean of the two observers) was calculated for each measure. The 99 differences were classified into categories (less than or equal to 5, less than or equal to 10, less than or equal to 15 mmHg). The number of differences in each category was compared to the number required by the international protocol. An individual analysis was then done to determine for each subject the number of comparisons less than or equal to 5 mmHg. At least 22 of the 33 subjects should have two of their three comparisons less than or equal to 5 mmHg. Results The two tested devices passed the first phase of the validation process. For the second phase, the average differences between the device and mercury sphygmomanometer readings were - 0.9+/-5.8 and -0.8+/-4.8 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) respectively for the Omron M5-I device and -0.2+/- 4.5 and -2.0+/-4.8 mmHg for the Omron 705IT device. Readings for the two devices differing by less than 5, 10 and 15 mmHg for systolic and diastolic values fulfil the recommendation criteria of the international protocol as well as the individual analysis. Conclusions The Omron M-5I and the Omron 705IT devices pass the validation recommendations of the international protocol. (C) 2003 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 133
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1987, NAT STAND EL AUT SPH
[2]
AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE MONITORING AND BLOOD-PRESSURE SELF-MEASUREMENT IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION [J].
APPEL, LJ ;
STASON, WB .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 118 (11) :867-882
[3]
Guidelines for the use of self-blood pressure monitoring: a summary report of the first international consensus conference [J].
Asmar, R ;
Zanchetti, A .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2000, 18 (05) :493-508
[4]
Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, 1993, AM NAT STAND EL AUT
[5]
Bortolotto L A, 1999, Blood Press Monit, V4, P21, DOI 10.1097/00126097-199904010-00004
[6]
Cordoba R, 1997, Aten Primaria, V20, P247
[7]
Validation of the Omron HEM-907 device for blood pressure measurement [J].
El Assaad, MA ;
Topouchian, JA ;
Darné, BM ;
Asmar, RG .
BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2002, 7 (04) :237-241
[8]
FOSTER C, 1994, J HUM HYPERTENS, V8, P661
[9]
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE OSCILLOMETRIC METHOD FOR MEASURING INDIRECT BLOOD-PRESSURE [J].
GEDDES, LA ;
VOELZ, M ;
COMBS, C ;
REINER, D ;
BABBS, CF .
ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1982, 10 (06) :271-280
[10]
*GROUP EV MES SOC, PRIS TENS ART CAB ME