Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals

被引:187
作者
Kimber, I
Basketter, DA
Butler, M
Gamer, A
Garrigue, JL
Gerberick, GF
Newsome, C
Steiling, W
Vohr, HW
机构
[1] Syngenta Cent Toxicol Lab, Macclesfield SK10 4TJ, Cheshire, England
[2] SEAC Toxicol Unit, Unilever Res, Colworth MK44 1LQ, Beds, England
[3] ECETOC, B-1160 Brussels, Belgium
[4] BASF Aktiengesselschaft, D-67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany
[5] Loreal Rech, F-93601 Aulnay Sous Bois, France
[6] Procter & Gamble Co, Miami Valley Labs, Cincinnati, OH 45253 USA
[7] Dow Chem Co USA, W Drayton UB7 0DQ, Middx, England
[8] Henkel KGAA, D-40191 Dusseldorf, Germany
[9] Bayer AG, D-42096 Wuppertal, Germany
关键词
allergic contact dermatitis; skin sensitisation potency; local lymph node assay (LLNA); guinea pig sensitisation test methods; categorisation and classification;
D O I
10.1016/S0278-6915(03)00223-0
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
It is clear that contact allergens vary substantially with regard to the relative potency with which they are able to induce skin sensitisation. Considerations of potency will in the future become a significant factor in the classification of skin sensitising chemicals. It is therefore appropriate to establish what is known of potency and thresholds in the induction of skin sensitisation and the elicitation of allergic contact dermatitis, and to identify approaches that might be available for assessment of relative potency for the purposes of categorising chemical allergens. This paper was prepared by an ECETOC (European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology) Task Force that had the objective of recommending approaches for the measurement of potency and definition of thresholds for both the induction and elicitation of contact sensitisation. The deliberations recorded here build upon recommendations made previously by an ECETOC Task Force that considered the conduct of standard skin sensitisation test methods for the purposes of hazard identification and risk assessment (ECETOC, Monograph No. 29, Brussels, 2000). The emphasis in this present paper is also on standard and accepted methods for the assessment of skin sensitisation, and for which OECD guidelines are available: the local lymph node assay (LLNA), the guinea pig maximisation test and the occluded patch test of Buehler. For various reasons, discussed in detail herein, attention focused primarily upon consideration of categorisation of chemical allergens and the identification of thresholds with respect to the induction of skin sensitisation, rather than the elicitation of allergic contact dermatitis. It is concluded that although the LLNA is the method of choice for the determination of skin sensitisation potency for the purposes of categorisation, if data are already available from appropriate guinea pig tests then their judicious interpretation may provide information of value in determinations of potency and categorisation. Included here are detailed and specific recommendations for how best the results of the three test methods considered can be used for the categorisation of chemical allergens as a function of skin sensitisation potency. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1799 / 1809
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Andersen KE, 1995, ACTA DERM-VENEREOL, V75, P463
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, OFFICIAL J EUROPEA L, VL 200, P1
[3]   An interlaboratory evaluation of the Buehler test for the identification and classification of skin sensitizers [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Gerberick, GE .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1996, 35 (03) :146-151
[4]   Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Blaikie, L ;
Dearman, RJ ;
Kimber, I ;
Ryan, CA ;
Gerberick, GF ;
Harvey, P ;
Evans, P ;
White, IR ;
Rycroft, RJG .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2000, 42 (06) :344-348
[5]   Skin sensitization risk assessment: a comparative evaluation of 3 isothiazolinone biocides [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Rodford, R ;
Kimber, I ;
Smith, I ;
Wahlberg, JE .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1999, 40 (03) :150-154
[6]   Local lymph node assay - validation, conduct and use in practice [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Evans, P ;
Fielder, RJ ;
Gerberick, GF ;
Dearman, RJ ;
Kimber, I .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2002, 40 (05) :593-598
[7]   Skin sensitisation, vehicle effects and the local lymph node assay [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Gerberick, GF ;
Kimber, I .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2001, 39 (06) :621-627
[8]   Human potency predictions for aldehydes using the local lymph node assay [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Wright, ZM ;
Warbrick, EV ;
Dearman, RJ ;
Kimber, I ;
Ryan, CA ;
Gerberick, GF ;
White, IR .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2001, 45 (02) :89-94
[9]   Dinitrohalobenzenes: Evaluation of relative skin sensitization potential using the local lymph node assay [J].
Basketter, DA ;
Dearman, RJ ;
Hilton, J ;
Kimber, I .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1997, 36 (02) :97-100
[10]  
Basketter DA, 1999, J APPL TOXICOL, V19, P261, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1263(199907/08)19:4<261::AID-JAT572>3.3.CO