Misoprostol alone for early abortion: an evaluation of seven potential regimens

被引:30
作者
Blanchard, K [1 ]
Shochet, T
Coyaji, K
Ngoc, NTN
Winikoff, B
机构
[1] Ibis Reprod Hlth, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Populat Council, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] KEM Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Rasta Peth 411011, Rao, India
[5] Hungvuong Hosp, Ho Chi Minh City Q5, Vietnam
[6] Gynu Hlth Projects, New York, NY 10010 USA
关键词
misoprostol; medical abortion; pregnancy termination;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2005.02.008
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction: A growing body of literature has shown that misoprostol alone could be effective for early medical abortion. We evaluated seven potential regimens in women up to 56 days of gestation in order to potentially identify an optimal regimen. Methods: In phase I of the study, women requesting early abortion were randomized to one of three misoprostol regimens (4 X 400 mu g po every 3 h, 2 x 800 mu g po every 6 h, 1 x 600 pv mu g); in phase II, women were randomized to one of two regimens (2 X 800 mu g po every 3 h, 1 x 800 pv mu g). In phase III, we consecutively tested two regimens (800 mu g pv wetted with saline repeated after 24 h if intact gestational sac, 2 X 800 mu g pv wetted with saline) to validate previously published results. Results: Although most women experienced some side effects, all regimens were tolerable and acceptable. Five of the seven regimens resulted in complete abortion rates of 60% or less. Only repeated doses of 800 mu g pv misoprostol resulted in efficacy exceeding 60%. Discussion: Misoprostol-alone abortion regimens using oral misoprostol are too ineffective for clinical use or further investigation. Regimens with repeated dosing of misoprostol 800 mu g pv warrant further study to find the optimal treatment protocol. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 97
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]   Women's preferences for general or local anesthesia for pain during first trimester surgical abortion in India [J].
Clark, S ;
Krishna, U ;
Kallenbach, L ;
Mandlekar, A ;
Raote, V ;
Ellertson, C .
CONTRACEPTION, 2002, 66 (04) :275-279
[12]   METHOTREXATE AND MISOPROSTOL VS MISOPROSTOL ALONE FOR EARLY ABORTION - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL [J].
CREININ, MD ;
VITTINGHOFF, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (15) :1190-1195
[13]   A randomized trial of the effect of moistening misoprostol before vaginal administration when used with methotrexate for abortion [J].
Creinin, MD ;
Carbonell, JLL ;
Schwartz, JL ;
Varela, L ;
Tanda, R .
CONTRACEPTION, 1999, 59 (01) :11-16
[14]   Can women in less-developed countries use a simplified medical abortion regimen? [J].
Elul, B ;
Hajri, S ;
Nguyen, TNN ;
Ellertson, C ;
Ben Slama, C ;
Pearlman, E ;
Winikoff, B .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9266) :1402-1405
[15]   A randomized trial of saline solution-moistened misoprostol versus dry misoprostol for first-trimester pregnancy failure [J].
Gilles, JM ;
Creinin, MD ;
Barnhart, K ;
Westhoff, C ;
Frederick, MM ;
Zhang, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 190 (02) :389-394
[16]  
GOLDSTEIN SR, 1994, J ULTRAS MED, V13, P27
[17]   Early pregnancy termination with intravaginally administered sodium chloride solution-moistened misoprostol tablets: Historical comparison with mifepristone and oral misoprostol [J].
Jain, JA ;
Meckstroth, KR ;
Mishell, DR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (06) :1386-1391
[18]   A prospective randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial comparing mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol to vaginal misoprostol alone for elective termination of early pregnancy [J].
Jain, JK ;
Dutton, C ;
Harwood, B ;
Meckstroth, KR ;
Mishell, DR .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (06) :1477-1482
[19]   A comparison of tamoxifen and misoprostol to misoprostol alone for early pregnancy termination [J].
Jain, JK ;
Meckstroth, KR ;
Park, M ;
Mishell, DR .
CONTRACEPTION, 1999, 60 (06) :353-356
[20]   The use of misoprostol for termination of early pregnancy [J].
Koopersmith, TB ;
Mishell, DR .
CONTRACEPTION, 1996, 53 (04) :237-242