Inhibition of return is not a foraging facilitator in saccadic search and free viewing

被引:84
作者
Hooge, ITC
Over, EAB
van Wezel, RJA
Frens, MA
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Helmholtz Inst, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Astron Inst, Inst Helminthol, NL-3584 CC Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Helmholtz Inst, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, Helmholtz Inst, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
saccade; visual search; inhibition of return; attention; human;
D O I
10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.030
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The ability to search and scan the environment effectively is a prerequisite for spatial behavior. A longstanding theory (Posner M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma, & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X(pp. 53 1556). London: Erlbaum) proposes that inhibition of previously attended loci (Inhibition of return; IOR) serves to facilitate exploration by increasing the likelihood to inspect new areas instead of returning to locations that have been inspected before. In this eye movement study we tested whether we could find evidence in favor of this hypothesis. Here we report that IOR does occur during search and free viewing, because we found increased fixation times preceding return saccades (eye movements that return to previously fixated locations). Meanwhile we observed no influence of IOR on the search strategy. Rather than the predicted low number we found many return saccades. Therefore, IOR does not serve as a foraging facilitator in saccadic search and free viewing. We hypothesize that IOR is an intrinsic aspect of shifting attention and gaze direction and furthermore that it is not always advantageous to prevent return saccades. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1901 / 1908
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   VISUAL SEARCH IN COMPLEX FIELDS - SIZE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TARGET DISK AND SURROUNDING DISKS [J].
BLOOMFIELD, JR .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1972, 14 (02) :139-+
[2]   The role of spatial working memory in inhibition of return: Evidence from divided attention tasks [J].
Castel, AD ;
Pratt, J ;
Craik, FIM .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2003, 65 (06) :970-981
[3]   PRECISE RECORDING OF HUMAN EYE-MOVEMENTS [J].
COLLEWIJN, H ;
VANDERMARK, F ;
JANSEN, TC .
VISION RESEARCH, 1975, 15 (03) :447-&
[4]   Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism [J].
Deubel, H ;
Schneider, WX .
VISION RESEARCH, 1996, 36 (12) :1827-1837
[5]   Inhibition of return with rapid serial shifts of attention: Implications for memory and visual search [J].
Dodd, MD ;
Castel, AD ;
Pratt, J .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2003, 65 (07) :1126-1135
[6]   Binocular coupling in chameleon saccade generation [J].
Frens, MA ;
van Beuzekom, AD ;
Sándor, PS ;
Henn, V .
BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 1998, 78 (01) :57-61
[7]   Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search [J].
Gilchrist, ID ;
Harvey, M .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (19) :1209-1212
[8]  
HENDERSON JM, 1992, VISUAL ATTENTION EYE
[9]   Inhibition of saccade return (ISR): spatio-temporal properties of saccade programming [J].
Hooge, ITC ;
Frens, MA .
VISION RESEARCH, 2000, 40 (24) :3415-3426
[10]   Adjustment of fixation duration in visual search [J].
Hooge, ITC ;
Erkelens, CJ .
VISION RESEARCH, 1998, 38 (09) :1295-1302