Initial use of a novel instrument to measure professionalism in surgical residents

被引:34
作者
Gauger, PG
Gruppen, LD
Minter, RM
Colletti, LM
Stern, DT
机构
[1] Dept Surg, Div Endocrine Surg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Med Educ, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME); competency; measurement; outcomes project; professionalism; reliability;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.09.020
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: No universally accepted method to measure professionalism exists. We developed an instrument to measure specific aspects of professionalism in surgical residents. Methods: Professionalism was deconstructed into 15 domains. Behavioral descriptors. were determined for extreme and selected intermediate anchors. It became evident that residents could "go too far" in some professional behaviors. Therefore, although a 7-point continuous ordinal scale forms the framework, a score of 7 does not necessarily indicate the ideal. This characteristic minimizes the problem of inflated ratings. Results: The instrument was utilized by attending faculty to evaluate residents and also by residents as a self-evaluation. Calculated from ordinal values, mean (SD) of the ratings across domains for faculty evaluations of residents was 4.95 (0.38) while mean for self-evaluations was 4.95 (0.39). Reliability was high (coefficient alpha 0.85). Conclusions: This instrument provides a means to measure professional behaviors during surgical residency. Repeated use will be required to thoroughly establish validity and reliability. (c) 2005 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 487
页数:9
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
ACS Task Force Professionalism, 2003, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V197, P603
[2]   Can professionalism be measured? The development of a scale for use in the medical environment [J].
Arnold, EL ;
Blank, LL ;
Race, KEH ;
Cipparrone, N .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1998, 73 (10) :1119-1121
[3]   Assessing professional behavior: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow [J].
Arnold, L .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2002, 77 (06) :502-515
[4]   EVALUATION OF HUMANISTIC QUALITIES IN THE INTERNIST [J].
BENSON, JA .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1983, 99 (05) :720-724
[5]   Teaching compassion and respect - Attending physicians' responses to problematic behaviors [J].
Burack, JH ;
Irby, DM ;
Carline, JD ;
Root, RK ;
Larson, EB .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 14 (01) :49-55
[6]   Context, conflict, and resolution: A new conceptual framework for evaluating professionalism [J].
Ginsburg, S ;
Regehr, G ;
Hatala, R ;
McNaughton, N ;
Frohna, A ;
Hodges, B ;
Lingard, L ;
Stern, D .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2000, 75 (10) :S6-S11
[7]   Professionalism in surgery [J].
Gruen, RL ;
Arya, J ;
Cosgrove, EM ;
Cruess, RL ;
Cruess, SR ;
Eastman, AB ;
Fabri, PJ ;
Friedman, P ;
Kirksey, TD ;
Kodner, IJ ;
Lewis, FR ;
Liscum, KR ;
Organ, CH ;
Rosenfeld, JC ;
Russell, TR ;
Sachdeva, AK ;
Zook, EG ;
Harken, AH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2003, 197 (04) :605-608
[8]   Assessing how well three evaluation methods detect deficiencies in medical students' professionalism in two settings of an internal medicine clerkship [J].
Hemmer, PA ;
Hawkins, R ;
Jackson, JL ;
Pangaro, LN .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2000, 75 (02) :167-173
[9]   A strategy for the detection and evaluation of unprofessional behavior in medical students [J].
Papadakis, MA ;
Osborn, EHS ;
Cooke, M ;
Healy, K .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1999, 74 (09) :980-990
[10]  
Parsons T., 1991, SOCIAL SYSTEM