Knee rating scales

被引:71
作者
Marx, RG [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg, Ctr Clin Outcome Res, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
knee; quality of life; measurement of outcome; knee rating scales;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.029
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In the past 2 decades, outcome assessment following knee surgery has focused increasingly on the patient's perspective. While traditional measures of outcome, including physical examination, imaging studies, and measures of knee laxity are complementary, questionnaires have become more important in determining the value of a procedure. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness are all important measurement qualities for health-related quality of life instruments. There are several questionnaires available, both for active patients with disorders of the knee, as well as for older patients with degenerative conditions. Activity level is also an important prognostic variable for patients with disorders of the knee. Clinical researchers should also use a validated activity rating scale to evaluate what patients are doing, in addition to how they are doing.
引用
收藏
页码:1103 / 1108
页数:6
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]
*AM AC ORTH SURG, 1998, SCOR ALG LOW LIMB OU
[2]
Armitage P., 2001, STAT METHODS MED RES, V4th
[3]
BARBER SD, 1990, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V255, P204
[4]
Rigorous statistical reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing of the Cincinnati knee rating system in 350 subjects with uninjured, injured, or anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees [J].
Barber-Westin, SD ;
Noyes, FR ;
McCloskey, JW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (04) :402-416
[5]
INTRACLASS CORRELATION COEFFICIENT AS A MEASURE OF RELIABILITY [J].
BARTKO, JJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1966, 19 (01) :3-&
[6]
Evaluating changes in health status: Reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders [J].
Beaton, DE ;
HoggJohnson, S ;
Bombardier, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (01) :79-93
[7]
BELLAMY N, 1990, J RHEUMATOL, V17, P364
[8]
BELLAMY N, 1988, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P1833
[9]
BELLAMY N, 1995, J RHEUMATOL, V22, P49
[10]
COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT - WHY PLOTTING DIFFERENCE AGAINST STANDARD METHOD IS MISLEADING [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982) :1085-1087