Cooperation in international environmental negotiations due to a preference for equity

被引:75
作者
Lange, A
Vogt, C
机构
[1] Ctr European Econ Res, ZEW, D-68034 Mannheim, Germany
[2] Univ Heidelberg, Interdisciplinary Inst Environm Econ, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
international environmental negotiations; cooperation; equity preference; coalition formation;
D O I
10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00044-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper demonstrates that cooperation in international environmental negotiations can be explained by preferences for equity. Within a N-country prisoner's dilemma in which agents can either cooperate or defect, in addition to the standard non-cooperative equilibrium, cooperation of a large fraction or even of all countries can establish a Nash equilibrium. In an emission game, however, where countries can choose their abatement level continuously, equity preferences cannot improve upon the standard inefficient Nash equilibrium. Finally, in a two stage game on coalition formation, the presence of equity-interested countries increases the coalition size and leads to efficiency gains. Here, even a stable agreement with full cooperation can be reached. (C) 2002 Elsevier B.V. All tights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2049 / 2067
页数:19
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE EC PO
[2]  
[Anonymous], CONFLICTS COOPERATIO
[3]   SELF-ENFORCING INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS [J].
BARRETT, S .
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 1994, 46 :878-894
[4]  
Barrett S., 1997, INT ENV NEGOTIATIONS
[5]   ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition [J].
Bolton, GE ;
Ockenfels, A .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 90 (01) :166-193
[6]  
BOLTON GE, 2001, HDB EXPT EC RESULTS
[7]   STRATEGIES FOR THE INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT [J].
CARRARO, C ;
SINISCALCO, D .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1993, 52 (03) :309-328
[8]   The core of an economy with multilateral environmental externalities [J].
Chander P. ;
Tulkens H. .
International Journal of Game Theory, 1997, 26 (3) :379-401
[9]  
DASGUPTA C, 1994, NEGOTIATING CLIMATE, P129
[10]  
Hoel Michael., 1992, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V2, P141, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00338240