Withdrawal of ventricular assist device support

被引:23
作者
MacIver, J [1 ]
Ross, HJ
机构
[1] Toronto Gen Hosp, Div Cardiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Toronto Gen Hosp, Div Transplantat, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1177/082585970502100307
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Ventricular assist devices (VAD) are mechanical pumps implanted into patients with advanced heart failure who are at risk of imminent death. VADs are a treatment and not a cure, and mortality on device support remains high. Recognizing the dire nature of the decisions for patients and families and the associated high mortality rates, we actively included processes for device withdrawal as part of our program mandate. Methods: At Toronto General Hospital, from October 2001 to December 2004, 22 patients underwent implantation of a VAD. Seven patients died following device withdrawal. Results: The average time spent on support prior to device withdrawal was seven days. In four of the seven cases, family members initiated discussions regarding device withdrawal. Family-initiated discussions were more likely to occur if patients were implanted electively, as a bridge to transplantation. Disagreements occurred between the ICU and the transplant teams regarding the timing of device withdrawal and responsibility for stopping the pump. Discussion: Establishing a process for device withdrawal has been a key factor in the success of our VAD program. This process relies heavily on pre-implantation preparation, a strategy for resolving disagreements, and a process for withdrawing device support.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 156
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   When withdrawal of life-sustaining care does more than allow death to take its course: The dilemma of left ventricular assist devices [J].
Bramstedt, KA ;
Wenger, NS .
JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 20 (05) :544-548
[2]   Mechanical Circulatory Support device database of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Second Annual Report-2004 [J].
Deng, MC ;
Edwards, LB ;
Hertz, MI ;
Rowe, AW ;
Keck, BM ;
Kormos, R ;
Naftel, DC ;
Kirklin, JK .
JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 23 (09) :1027-1034
[3]  
Etchells E, 1996, CAN MED ASSOC J, V155, P177
[4]   Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients [J].
Fried, TR ;
Bradley, EH ;
Towle, VR ;
Allore, H .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (14) :1061-1066
[5]   Consensus statement:: Palliative and supportive care in advanced heart failure [J].
Goodlin, SJ ;
Hauptman, PJ ;
Arnold, R ;
Grady, K ;
Hershberger, RE ;
Kutner, J ;
Masoudi, F ;
Spertus, J ;
Dracup, K ;
Cleary, JF ;
Medak, R ;
Crispell, K ;
Piña, I ;
Stuart, B ;
Whitney, C ;
Rector, T ;
Teno, J ;
Renlund, DG .
JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2004, 10 (03) :200-209
[6]   Resuscitation preferences among patients with severe congestive heart failure - Results from the SUPPORT project [J].
Krumholz, HM ;
Phillips, RS ;
Hamel, MB ;
Teno, JM ;
Bellamy, P ;
Broste, SK ;
Califf, RM ;
Vidaillet, H ;
Davis, RB ;
Muhlbaier, LH ;
Connors, AF ;
LYnn, J ;
Goldman, L .
CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (07) :648-655
[7]  
Liu P, 2003, CAN J CARDIOL, V19, P347
[8]  
Naylor CD, 1999, CARDIOVASCULAR HLTH
[9]   Left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy: A new look at survival [J].
Park, SJ ;
Tector, A ;
Piccioni, W ;
Raines, E ;
Gelijns, A ;
Moskowitz, A ;
Rose, E ;
Holman, W ;
Furukawa, S ;
Frazier, OH ;
Dembitsky, W .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 129 (01) :9-17
[10]   Discontinuing the LVAD: Ethical considerations [J].
Powell, TP ;
Oz, MC .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1997, 63 (05) :1223-1224