Control of decoherence: Analysis and comparison of three different strategies

被引:187
作者
Facchi, P [1 ]
Tasaki, S
Pascazio, S
Nakazato, H
Tokuse, A
Lidar, DA
机构
[1] Univ Bari, Dipartimento Fis, I-70126 Bari, Italy
[2] Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, Sez Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy
[3] Waseda Univ, Dept Appl Phys, Tokyo 1698555, Japan
[4] Waseda Univ, Adv Inst Complex Syst, Tokyo 1698555, Japan
[5] Waseda Univ, Dept Phys, Tokyo 1698555, Japan
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Chem, Chem Phys Theory Grp, Toronto, ON M5S 3H6, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Ctr Quantum Informat & Quantum Control, Toronto, ON M5S 3H6, Canada
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW A | 2005年 / 71卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.71.022302
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
We analyze and compare three different strategies, all aimed at controlling and eventually halting decoherence. The first strategy hinges upon the quantum Zeno effect, the second makes use of frequent unitary interruptions ("bang-bang" pulses and their generalization, quantum dynamical decoupling), and the third uses a strong, continuous coupling. Decoherence is shown to be suppressed only if the frequency N of the measurements or pulses is large enough or if the coupling K is sufficiently strong. Otherwise, if N or K is large, but not extremely large, all these control procedures accelerate decoherence. We investigate the problem in a general setting and then consider some practical examples, relevant for quantum computation.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 157 条
[11]  
BERRY M, 1995, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V755, P303
[12]  
Berry MV, 1996, J MOD OPTIC, V43, P165, DOI 10.1080/09500349608232731
[13]   QUANTUM MAPS [J].
BERRY, MV ;
BALAZS, NL ;
TABOR, M ;
VOROS, A .
ANNALS OF PHYSICS, 1979, 122 (01) :26-63
[14]  
BESKOW A, 1967, ARK FYS, V34, P561
[15]   STRONGLY COUPLED QUANTUM AND CLASSICAL-SYSTEMS AND ZENO EFFECT [J].
BLANCHARD, P ;
JADCZYK, A .
PHYSICS LETTERS A, 1993, 183 (04) :272-276
[16]   Bang-Bang Operations from a Geometric Perspective [J].
Byrd, Mark S. ;
Lidar, Daniel A. .
QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2002, 1 (1-2) :19-34
[17]   Empirical determination of dynamical decoupling operations [J].
Byrd, MS ;
Lidar, DA .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2003, 67 (01) :14
[18]   Spin-based all-optical quantum computation with quantum dots: Understanding and suppressing decoherence [J].
Calarco, T ;
Datta, A ;
Fedichev, P ;
Pazy, E ;
Zoller, P .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2003, 68 (01) :21
[19]   Good quantum error-correcting codes exist [J].
Calderbank, AR ;
Shor, PW .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1996, 54 (02) :1098-1105
[20]  
Casati G., 1979, LECTURE NOTES PHYSIC, V93, P334, DOI DOI 10.1007/BFB0021757