Fast track hysterectomy

被引:85
作者
Moller, C
Kehlet, H
Friland, SG
Schouenborg, LO
Lund, C
Ottesen, B
机构
[1] Hvidovre Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
[2] Hvidovre Univ Hosp, Laparoscop Unit, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
[3] Hvidovre Univ Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
[4] Hvidovre Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
关键词
length of stay; convalescence; laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy; abdominal hysterectomy; fist track surgery;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00342-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
Objective: To identify factors limiting early discharge after laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and abdominal hysterectomy, in a fast track setting with emphasis on information, treatment of pain, early mobilization, and early food intake. Study Design: A prospective, descriptive study of 32 unselected women allocated to either abdominal hysterectomy (n = 16) or LAVH (n = 16). The patients received the same information, care, and advice for the perioperative period except for an assumed 1-day hospital stay in the LAVH-group and 2 days in the abdominal group. Results: Patients were discharged median 1 day (1-3) after LAVH and 2 days (2-4) after abdominal hysterectomy. Work was resumed median 23 days after abdominal hysterectomy and 28 days after LAVH (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The study questions the previously proposed advantages of shortened hospitalization and convalescence after LAVH compared with abdominal hysterectomy. Further studies with active rehabilitation are needed to demonstrate real differences between laparoscopic and open hysterectomy. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 22
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
Callesen T, 1999, EUR J SURG, V165, P236
[2]
Costs and charges associated with three alternative techniques of hysterectomy [J].
Dorsey, JH ;
Holtz, PM ;
Griffiths, RI ;
McGrath, MM ;
Steinberg, EP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (07) :476-482
[3]
Doucette RC, 1996, J REPROD MED, V41, P1
[4]
A randomized trial with a cost-consequence analysis after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy [J].
Ellström, M ;
Ferraz-Nunes, J ;
Hahlin, M ;
Olsson, JH .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 91 (01) :30-34
[5]
Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy [J].
Falcone, T ;
Paraiso, MFR ;
Mascha, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 180 (04) :955-962
[6]
Fylstra DL, 1996, J REPROD MED, V41, P497
[7]
Finnish national register of laparoscopic hysterectomies: A review and complications of 1165 operations [J].
HarkkiSiren, P ;
Sjoberg, J ;
Makinen, J ;
Heinonen, PK ;
Kauko, M ;
Tomas, E ;
Laatikainen, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 176 (01) :118-122
[8]
Surgical stress response: Does endoscopic surgery confer an advantage? [J].
Kehlet, H .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 23 (08) :801-807
[9]
Comparison between laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and abdominal hysterectomy [J].
Kunz, G ;
Plath, T ;
Leyendecker, G .
GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 1996, 56 (09) :453-457
[10]
Abdominal hysterectomy should not be considered as a primary method for uterine removal - A prospective randomised study of 100 patients referred to hysterectomy [J].
Langebrekke, A ;
Eraker, R ;
Nesheim, BI ;
Urnes, A ;
Busund, B ;
Sponland, G .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1996, 75 (04) :404-407