Platform transience: changes in Facebook's policies, procedures, and affordances in global electoral politics

被引:29
作者
Barrett, Bridget [1 ]
Kreiss, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Hussman Sch Journalism & Media, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
来源
INTERNET POLICY REVIEW | 2019年 / 8卷 / 04期
关键词
Platforms; Electoral politics; Platform change; Platform policies; ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.14763/2019.4.1446
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This paper presents two case studies of Facebook's rapid changes relating to international electoral politics: the "I'm a Voter" affordance and the platform's data and targeting capabilities. The article shows how Facebook changed with respect to its policies, procedures, and affordances, especially given the normative pressure exerted by journalists. Drawing from these case studies, we conceptualise continual and rapid change as "platform transience" and argue that it often arises from external pressure and economic considerations. Platform transience has significant implications for the ability of stakeholders to hold platforms accountable, raises significant issues for electoral fairness, and increases the potential for unequal political information environments.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Toward an Ethics of Algorithms: Convening, Observation, Probability, and Timeliness
    Ananny, Mike
    [J]. SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2016, 41 (01) : 93 - 117
  • [2] Angwin Julia, 2017, PROPUBLICA 0914
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, Personal Data: Political Persuasion-Inside the Influence Industry. How it works
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2019, FACEBOOK BUSINE 0524
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2016, INDEPENDENT
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2016, FACEBOOK NEWSRO 1028
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2008, FACEBOOK NEWSRO 0104
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2017, EVOLUTION FACEBOOK A
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2018, The GuardianJuly 11
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2018, FACEBOOK NEWSRO 1023