Transition to drug addiction: a negative reinforcement model based on an allostatic decrease in reward function

被引:171
作者
Ahmed, SH [1 ]
Koob, GF
机构
[1] Univ Bordeaux 2, CNRS, UMR 5541, Lab Neuropsychobiol Desadaptat, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
[2] Scripps Res Inst, Dept Neuropharmacol, La Jolla, CA 92103 USA
关键词
reward; reinforcement; self-administration; self-medication; self-regulation; dopamine; cocaine; laboratory environment;
D O I
10.1007/s00213-005-2180-z
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Rationale: The transition from initial drug use to drug addiction has been proposed to result from an allostatic decrease in reward function driven by an over-activation of brain antireward processes. Objectives: How decreased reward function explains compulsive drug use is not entirely clear at present, and is still a subject for debate. Methods: We present a quantitative model of cocaine self-administration that integrates pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and motivational factors to address this question. The model assumes that reward system responsivity is a homeostatically regulated process where the desired level of responsivity ( called the reward set point) is initially different from the baseline level. The reduction or correction of this difference or error in reward function would drive cocaine self-administration. Results: Theoretical data obtained by computer simulation fit the experimental data obtained in animals self-administering cocaine (i.e.,the within-session pattern of self-injections, the shape and curvature of the dose-injection function, the nonlinear relationship between drug intake and regulated drug effects). Importantly, simulation of an allostatic decrease in reward system responsivity exacerbates the initial error that drives self-administration, thereby increasing both the intake of, and the motivation for, the drug. This allostatic change manifests as a vertical shift in the dose-injection function similar to that seen in animals with escalating cocaine self-administration. Conclusions: The present model provides a satisfactory explanation of escalated drug intake and suggests a novel negative reinforcement view of addiction based on an allostatic decrease in reward function.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 490
页数:18
相关论文
共 126 条
  • [21] A CONCURRENTLY AVAILABLE NONDRUG REINFORCER PREVENTS THE ACQUISITION OR DECREASES THE MAINTENANCE OF COCAINE-REINFORCED BEHAVIOR
    CARROLL, ME
    LAC, ST
    NYGAARD, SL
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1989, 97 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [22] AUTOSHAPING IV COCAINE SELF-ADMINISTRATION IN RATS - EFFECTS OF NONDRUG ALTERNATIVE REINFORCERS ON ACQUISITION
    CARROLL, ME
    LAC, ST
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 110 (1-2) : 5 - 12
  • [23] Progressive enhancement of delayed hyperalgesia induced by repeated heroin administration:: A sensitization process
    Célèrier, E
    Laulin, JP
    Corcuff, JB
    Le Moal, M
    Simonnet, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 21 (11) : 4074 - 4080
  • [24] Chang JY, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P3098
  • [25] SELF-ADMINISTRATION OF PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES BY MONKEY - A MEASURE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL DEPENDENCE
    DENEAU, G
    YANAGITA, T
    SEEVERS, MH
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGIA, 1969, 16 (01): : 30 - &
  • [26] PARAMETERS OF SELF-ADMINISTRATION OF COCAINE IN RATS UNDER A PROGRESSIVE-RATIO SCHEDULE
    DEPOORTERE, RY
    LI, DH
    LANE, JD
    EMMETTOGLESBY, MW
    [J]. PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1993, 45 (03) : 539 - 548
  • [27] Dissociation of pavlovian and instrumental incentive learning under dopamine antagonists
    Dickinson, A
    Smith, J
    Mirenowicz, J
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 114 (03) : 468 - 483
  • [28] DOWNS DA, 1974, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V191, P179
  • [29] Dramatic decreases in brain reward function during nicotine withdrawal
    Epping-Jordan, MP
    Watkins, SS
    Koob, GF
    Markou, A
    [J]. NATURE, 1998, 393 (6680) : 76 - 79
  • [30] COCAINE - ACUTE EFFECTS ON REINFORCEMENT THRESHOLDS FOR SELF-STIMULATION BEHAVIOR TO MEDIAL FOREBRAIN-BUNDLE
    ESPOSITO, RU
    MOTOLA, AHD
    KORNETSKY, C
    [J]. PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1978, 8 (04) : 437 - 439