Diagnostic evaluation of conceptual rainfall-runoff models using temporal clustering

被引:86
作者
de Vos, N. J. [1 ]
Rientjes, T. H. M. [2 ]
Gupta, H. V. [3 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Water Resources Sect, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Dept Water Resources, NL-7500 AA Enschede, Netherlands
[3] Univ Arizona, Dept Hydrol & Water Resources, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
calibration; catchment modeling; clustering; diagnostic evaluation; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; HYDROLOGIC-MODELS; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION; IMPROVED CALIBRATION; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; UNCERTAINTY; EFFICIENT; CLASSIFICATION; IMPROVEMENT; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1002/hyp.7698
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Given the structural shortcomings of conceptual rainfall-runoff models and the common use of time-invariant model parameters, these parameters can be expected to represent broader aspects of the rainfall-runoff relationship than merely the static catchment characteristics that they are commonly supposed to quantify. In this article, we relax the common assumption of time-invariance of parameters, and instead seek signature information about the dynamics of model behaviour and performance. We do this by using a temporal clustering approach to identify periods of hydrological similarity, allowing the model parameters to vary over the clusters found in this manner, and calibrating these parameters simultaneously. The diagnostic information inferred from these calibration results, based on the patterns in the parameter sets of the various clusters, is used to enhance the model structure. This approach shows how diagnostic model evaluation can be used to combine information from the data and the functioning of the hydrological model in a useful manner. Copyright (c) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2840 / 2850
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Arthur D, 2007, PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTEENTH ANNUAL ACM-SIAM SYMPOSIUM ON DISCRETE ALGORITHMS, P1027
[2]   Validity-guided (re)clustering with applications to image segmentation [J].
Bensaid, AM ;
Hall, LO ;
Bezdek, JC ;
Clarke, LP ;
Silbiger, ML ;
Arrington, JA ;
Murtagh, RF .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 1996, 4 (02) :112-123
[3]  
Bergstrom S., 1976, SMHI Report RHO 7, V7, pISSN0347
[4]  
Boyle D., 2000, Ph.D. Thesis
[5]   Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods [J].
Boyle, DP ;
Gupta, HV ;
Sorooshian, S .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2000, 36 (12) :3663-3674
[6]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[7]   Self-adapting control parameters in differential evolution: A comparative study on numerical benchmark problems [J].
Brest, Janez ;
Greiner, Saso ;
Boskovic, Borko ;
Mernik, Marjan ;
Zumer, Vijern .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2006, 10 (06) :646-657
[8]   CLUSTER-ANALYSIS AS APPLIED TO REGIONAL FLOOD FREQUENCY [J].
BURN, DH .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1989, 115 (05) :567-582
[9]  
Burnash R. J. C., 1995, Computer models of watershed hydrology., P311
[10]   Multi-period and multi-criteria model conditioning to reduce prediction uncertainty in an application of TOPMODEL within the GLUE framework [J].
Choi, Hyung Tae ;
Beven, Keith .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2007, 332 (3-4) :316-336