Propofol vs midazolam for ICU sedation - A Canadian multicenter randomized trial

被引:104
作者
Hall, RI
Sandham, D
Cardinal, P
Tweeddale, M
Moher, D
Wang, XH
Anis, AH
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth 2 Hlth Sci Ctr, Halifax, NS B3H 3A7, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Foothills Hosp, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Ottawa Gen Hosp, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
[4] Vancouver Gen Hosp, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Ottawa Civic Hosp, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
[6] St Pauls Hosp, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
[7] Univ British Columbia, Dept Hlth Care & Epidemiol, Vancouver, BC V6T 1W5, Canada
关键词
ICU; mechanical ventilation; midazolam; multicenter; propofol; randomized clinical trial; sedation;
D O I
10.1378/chest.119.4.1151
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objectives: To determine whether sedation with propofol would lead to shorter times to tracheal extubation and ICU length of stay than sedation with midazolam. Design: Multicenter, randomized, open label. Setting: Four academic tertiary-care ICUs in Canada. Patients: Critically ill patients requiring continuous sedation while receiving mechanical ventilation. Interventions: Random allocation by predicted requirement for mechanical ventilation (short sedation stratum, < 24 h; medium sedation stratum, <greater than or equal to> 24 and < 72 h; and long sedation stratum, 72 h) to sedation regimens utilizing propofol or midazolam. Measurements and results: Using an intention-to-treat analysis, patients randomized to receive propofol in the short sedation stratum (propofol, 21 patients; midazolam, 26 patients) and the long sedation stratum (propofol, 4 patients; midazolam, 10 patients) were extubated earlier (short sedation stratum: propofol, 5.6 h; midazolam, 11.9 h; long sedation stratum: propofol, 8.4 h; midazolam, 46.8 h; p < 0.05). Pooled results showed that patients treated with propofol (n = 46) were extubated earlier than those treated with midazolam (n = 53) (6.7 vs 24.7 h, respectively; p < 0.05) following discontinuation of the sedation but were not discharged from ICU earlier (94.0 vs 63.7 h, respectively; p = 0.26), Propofol-treated patients spent a larger percentage of time at the target Ramsay sedation level than midazolam-treated patients (60.2% vs 44.0%, respectively; p < 0.05) Using a treatment-received analysis, propofol sedation either did not differ from midazolam sedation in time to tracheal extubation or ICU discharge (sedation duration, < 24 h) or was associated with earlier tracheal extubation but longer time to ICU discharge (sedation duration, <greater than or equal to> 24 h, < 72 h, or < 72 h). Conclusions: The use of propofol sedation allowed for more rapid tracheal extubation than when midazolam sedation was employed. This did not result in earlier ICU discharge.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1159
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   ANALGESIA AND SEDATION IN INTENSIVE-CARE [J].
AITKENHEAD, AR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1989, 63 (02) :196-206
[2]  
AMREIN R, 1991, INTENS CARE MED, V7, pS1
[3]   Prolonged sedation of critically ill patients with midazolam or propofol: Impact on weaning and costs [J].
BarrientosVega, R ;
SanchezSoria, MM ;
MoralesGarcia, C ;
RobasGomez, A ;
CuenaBoy, R ;
AyensaRincon, A .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 25 (01) :33-40
[4]   Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials - The CONSORT statement [J].
Begg, C ;
Cho, M ;
Eastwood, S ;
Horton, R ;
Moher, D ;
Olkin, I ;
Pitkin, R ;
Rennie, D ;
Schulz, KF ;
Simel, D ;
Stroup, DF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (08) :637-639
[5]   PROLONGED SEDATION WITH PROPOFOL IN ICU PATIENTS - RECOVERY AND BLOOD-CONCENTRATION CHANGES DURING PERIODIC INTERRUPTIONS IN INFUSION [J].
BELLER, JP ;
POTTECHER, T ;
LUGNIER, A ;
MANGIN, P ;
OTTENI, JC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1988, 61 (05) :583-588
[6]   PROPOFOL OR MIDAZOLAM FOR SHORT-TERM ALTERATIONS IN SEDATION [J].
BOYD, O ;
MACKAY, CJ ;
RUSHMER, F ;
BENNETT, ED ;
GROUNDS, RM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1993, 40 (12) :1142-1147
[7]  
BRUNBUISSON C, 1993, YB INTENSIVE CARE ME, P273
[8]   PROPOFOL VS MIDAZOLAM IN SHORT-TERM, MEDIUM-TERM, AND LONG-TERM SEDATION OF CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS - A COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS [J].
CARRASCO, G ;
MOLINA, R ;
COSTA, J ;
SOLER, JM ;
CABRE, L .
CHEST, 1993, 103 (02) :557-564
[9]   Comparative study of propofol versus midazolam in the sedation of critically ill patients: Results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial [J].
Chamorro, C ;
deLatorre, FJ ;
Montero, A ;
SanchezIzquierdo, JA ;
Jareno, A ;
Moreno, JA ;
Gonzalez, E ;
Barrios, M ;
Carpintero, JL ;
MartinSantos, F ;
Otero, B ;
Ginestal, R .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (06) :932-939
[10]   Should clinical trials with concurrent economic analyses be blinded? [J].
Freemantle, N ;
Drummond, M .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (01) :63-64