Propofol vs midazolam for ICU sedation - A Canadian multicenter randomized trial

被引:104
作者
Hall, RI
Sandham, D
Cardinal, P
Tweeddale, M
Moher, D
Wang, XH
Anis, AH
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth 2 Hlth Sci Ctr, Halifax, NS B3H 3A7, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Foothills Hosp, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Ottawa Gen Hosp, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
[4] Vancouver Gen Hosp, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Ottawa Civic Hosp, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
[6] St Pauls Hosp, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
[7] Univ British Columbia, Dept Hlth Care & Epidemiol, Vancouver, BC V6T 1W5, Canada
关键词
ICU; mechanical ventilation; midazolam; multicenter; propofol; randomized clinical trial; sedation;
D O I
10.1378/chest.119.4.1151
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objectives: To determine whether sedation with propofol would lead to shorter times to tracheal extubation and ICU length of stay than sedation with midazolam. Design: Multicenter, randomized, open label. Setting: Four academic tertiary-care ICUs in Canada. Patients: Critically ill patients requiring continuous sedation while receiving mechanical ventilation. Interventions: Random allocation by predicted requirement for mechanical ventilation (short sedation stratum, < 24 h; medium sedation stratum, <greater than or equal to> 24 and < 72 h; and long sedation stratum, 72 h) to sedation regimens utilizing propofol or midazolam. Measurements and results: Using an intention-to-treat analysis, patients randomized to receive propofol in the short sedation stratum (propofol, 21 patients; midazolam, 26 patients) and the long sedation stratum (propofol, 4 patients; midazolam, 10 patients) were extubated earlier (short sedation stratum: propofol, 5.6 h; midazolam, 11.9 h; long sedation stratum: propofol, 8.4 h; midazolam, 46.8 h; p < 0.05). Pooled results showed that patients treated with propofol (n = 46) were extubated earlier than those treated with midazolam (n = 53) (6.7 vs 24.7 h, respectively; p < 0.05) following discontinuation of the sedation but were not discharged from ICU earlier (94.0 vs 63.7 h, respectively; p = 0.26), Propofol-treated patients spent a larger percentage of time at the target Ramsay sedation level than midazolam-treated patients (60.2% vs 44.0%, respectively; p < 0.05) Using a treatment-received analysis, propofol sedation either did not differ from midazolam sedation in time to tracheal extubation or ICU discharge (sedation duration, < 24 h) or was associated with earlier tracheal extubation but longer time to ICU discharge (sedation duration, <greater than or equal to> 24 h, < 72 h, or < 72 h). Conclusions: The use of propofol sedation allowed for more rapid tracheal extubation than when midazolam sedation was employed. This did not result in earlier ICU discharge.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1159
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[31]   MIDAZOLAM INFUSION FOR SEDATION IN THE INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT - EFFECT ON ADRENAL-FUNCTION [J].
SHAPIRO, JM ;
WESTPHAL, LM ;
WHITE, PF ;
SLADEN, RN ;
ROSENTHAL, MH .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1986, 64 (03) :394-398
[32]  
TEASDALE G, 1974, LANCET, V2, P81
[33]   DISADVANTAGES OF PROLONGED PROPOFOL SEDATION IN THE CRITICAL CARE UNIT [J].
VALENTE, JF ;
ANDERSON, GL ;
BRANSON, RD ;
JOHNSON, DJ ;
DAVIS, K ;
POREMBKA, DT .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1994, 22 (04) :710-712
[34]   Midazolam versus propofol for long-term sedation in the ICU: a randomized prospective comparison [J].
Weinbroum, AA ;
Halpern, P ;
Rudick, V ;
Sorkine, P ;
Freedman, M ;
Geller, E .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 23 (12) :1258-1263