Somatic selection for and against cancer

被引:45
作者
Michor, F
Frank, SA
May, RM
Iwasa, Y
Nowak, MA
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Program Theoret Biol & Evolut Dynam, Dept Math, Dept Organism & Evolut Biol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Ecol & Evolut Biol, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[3] Univ Oxford, Dept Zool, Oxford OX1 3PS, England
[4] Kyushu Univ, Dept Biol, Fukuoka 8128581, Japan
关键词
mathematical model; evolutionary dynamics; tumorigenesis; oncogenes; tumor suppressor genes; genetic instability;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00267-4
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In multicellular organisms, cells cooperate within a well-defined developmental program. Cancer is a breakdown of such cooperation: cells mutate to phenotypes of uncoordinated proliferation. We study basic principles of the architecture of solid tissues that influence the rate of cancer initiation. In particular, we explore how somatic selection acts to prevent or to promote cancer. Cells with mutations in oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes often have increased proliferation rates. Somatic selection increases their abundance and thus enhances the risk of cancer. Many potentially harmful mutations, however, increase the probability of triggering apoptosis and, hence, initially lead to cells with reduced net proliferation rates. Such cells are eliminated by somatic selection, which therefore also works to reduce the risk of cancer. We show that a tissue organization into small compartments avoids the rapid spread of mutations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, but promotes genetic instability. In small compartments, genetic instability, which confers a selective disadvantage for the cell, can spread by random drift. If both deleterious and advantageous mutations participate in tumor initiation, then we find an intermediate optimum for the compartment size. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 382
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, The genetic basis of human cancer
[2]   Stem cells: the intestinal stem cell as a paradigm [J].
Bach, SP ;
Renehan, AG ;
Potten, CS .
CARCINOGENESIS, 2000, 21 (03) :469-476
[3]   Carcinogen-specific induction of genetic instability [J].
Bardelli, A ;
Cahill, CP ;
Lederer, G ;
Speicher, MR ;
Kinzler, KW ;
Vogelstein, B ;
Lengauer, C .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (10) :5770-5775
[4]   Genomic instability, DNA methylation, and natural selection in colorectal carcinogenesis [J].
Breivik, J ;
Gaudernack, G .
SEMINARS IN CANCER BIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (04) :245-254
[5]   Carcinogenesis and natural selection: A new perspective to the genetics and epigenetics of colorectal cancer [J].
Breivik, J ;
Gaudernack, G .
ADVANCES IN CANCER RESEARCH, VOL 76, 1999, 76 :187-+
[6]   MUTATION SELECTION AND NATURAL-HISTORY OF CANCER [J].
CAIRNS, J .
NATURE, 1975, 255 (5505) :197-200
[7]   The fate of microbial mutators [J].
de Visser, JAGM .
MICROBIOLOGY-SGM, 2002, 148 :1247-1252
[8]  
EWANS WJ, 1969, POPULATION GENETICS
[9]   A HUMAN DNA SEGMENT WITH PROPERTIES OF THE GENE THAT PREDISPOSES TO RETINOBLASTOMA AND OSTEOSARCOMA [J].
FRIEND, SH ;
BERNARDS, R ;
ROGELJ, S ;
WEINBERG, RA ;
RAPAPORT, JM ;
ALBERT, DM ;
DRYJA, TP .
NATURE, 1986, 323 (6089) :643-646
[10]   The rise and fall of mutator bacteria [J].
Giraud, A ;
Radman, M ;
Matic, I ;
Taddei, F .
CURRENT OPINION IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 4 (05) :582-585