Performance of the AutoPap primary screening system at Jefferson University Hospital

被引:25
作者
Bibbo, M
Hawthorne, C
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Dept Pathol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Cytopathol Lab, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
cervical smears; vaginal smears; automation; mass screening;
D O I
10.1159/000330864
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the AutoPap System for primary screening of cervical/vaginal cytologic smears at the 25% no review rate at Jefferson University Hospital. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 5,865 consecutive conventional and suitable cervical/vaginal smears, including high-risk cases, were processed by the AutoPap System. Slides designated "no further review" (NFR) were manually screened by a cytopathologist (rapid screening) and a cytotechnologist (detailed screening) to detect epithelial abnormalities and assess the slide adequacy. The presence of Candida or Trichomonas was noted. Three cytopathologists determined the final diagnosis of all epithelial abnormalities by majority agreement. RESULTS: Of 5,865 slides, 5,120 (87%) qualified for scanning. The system classified 1,280 slides as NFR (25%) and 3,840 (75%) as review. Manual screening of 1,280 slides classified as NFR revealed 1,252 cases within normal limits, 10 atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (4, favor low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 6 favor reactive) and 18 benign cellular changes. Adequacy assessment discrepancies were detected on 98 (19%) of 515 cases of satisfactory but limited by lack of endocervical component (SBLBLEC) and 15 (14%) of 105 cases on satisfactory but limited by inflammation/obscuration. Twenty-five percent of cases classified as SBLBLEC were vaginal smears. Trichomonas vaginalis was noted in 12 slides and Candida in 29. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results show that in our patient population, the AutoPap primary screener selected as NFR mostly slides within normal limits. The adequacy assessment discrepancies were comparable to those found in routine laboratory practice.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 29
页数:3
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   Computerized screening devices and performance assessment: Development of a policy towards automation - IAC Task Force summary [J].
Bartels, PH ;
Bibbo, M ;
Hutchinson, ML ;
Gahm, T ;
Grohs, HK ;
Gwi-Mak, E ;
Kaufman, EA ;
Kaufman, RH ;
Knight, BK ;
Koss, LG ;
Magruder, LE ;
Mango, LJ ;
McCallum, SM ;
Melamed, MR ;
Peebles, A ;
Richart, RM ;
Robinowitz, M ;
Rosenthal, DL ;
Sauer, T ;
Schenck, U ;
Tanaka, N ;
Topalidis, T ;
Verhest, AP ;
Wertlake, PT ;
Whittaker, JA ;
Wilbur, DC .
ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 1998, 42 (01) :59-68
[2]  
BARTELS PH, 1997, COMPREHENSIVE CYTOPA
[3]  
Lee James S. J., 1997, Pathology Research and Practice, V193, P436
[4]   ASSESSMENT OF CERVICOVAGINAL SMEAR ADEQUACY - THE BETHESDA SYSTEM GUIDELINES AND REPRODUCIBILITY [J].
SPIRES, SE ;
BANKS, ER ;
WEEKS, JA ;
BANKS, HW ;
DAVEY, DD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1994, 102 (03) :354-359
[5]   The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology - Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice [J].
Wilbur, DC ;
Prey, MU ;
Miller, WM ;
Pawlick, GF ;
Colgan, TJ .
ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 1998, 42 (01) :214-220