Capital account liberalization: Theory, evidence, and speculation

被引:216
作者
Henry, Peter Blair [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Brookings Inst, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
STOCK-MARKET LIBERALIZATION; DIRECT FOREIGN-INVESTMENT; CASH FLOW SENSITIVITIES; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; DOMESTIC FIRMS; WELFARE GAINS; ASSET PRICES; HOME BIAS; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1257/jel.45.4.887
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research on the macroeconomic impact Of capital account liberalization finds few, if any, robust effects of liberalization on real variables. In contrast to the prevailing wisdom, I argue that the textbook theory of liberalization holds up quite well to a critical reading of this literature. Most papers that find no effect of liberalization on real variables tell us nothing about the empirical validity of the theory because they do not really test it. This paper explains why it is that most studies do not really address the theory they set out to test. It also discusses what is necessary to test the theory and examines papers that have done so. Studies that actually best the theory show that liberalization has significant effects on the cost of capital, investment, and economic growth.
引用
收藏
页码:887 / 935
页数:49
相关论文
共 203 条
[1]  
ABDELAL R, 2002, 702040 HARV BUS SCH
[2]   Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela [J].
Aitken, BJ ;
Harrison, AE .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (03) :605-618
[3]  
Alesina A., 1994, CAPITAL MOBILITY IMP, P289
[4]  
ALFARO L, REV EC STAT
[5]   Capital flows and capital goods [J].
Alfaro, Laura ;
Hammel, Eliza .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 72 (01) :128-150
[6]  
[Anonymous], BROOKINGS PAPERS EC
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2003, 10152 NBER
[8]  
[Anonymous], 103 IMF
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Occasional Paper 220.
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2001, 8076 NBER