Capital account liberalization: Theory, evidence, and speculation

被引:216
作者
Henry, Peter Blair [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Brookings Inst, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
STOCK-MARKET LIBERALIZATION; DIRECT FOREIGN-INVESTMENT; CASH FLOW SENSITIVITIES; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; DOMESTIC FIRMS; WELFARE GAINS; ASSET PRICES; HOME BIAS; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1257/jel.45.4.887
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research on the macroeconomic impact Of capital account liberalization finds few, if any, robust effects of liberalization on real variables. In contrast to the prevailing wisdom, I argue that the textbook theory of liberalization holds up quite well to a critical reading of this literature. Most papers that find no effect of liberalization on real variables tell us nothing about the empirical validity of the theory because they do not really test it. This paper explains why it is that most studies do not really address the theory they set out to test. It also discusses what is necessary to test the theory and examines papers that have done so. Studies that actually best the theory show that liberalization has significant effects on the cost of capital, investment, and economic growth.
引用
收藏
页码:887 / 935
页数:49
相关论文
共 203 条
[11]  
[Anonymous], BROOKINGS PAPER EC A
[12]  
[Anonymous], 2002, 8837 NBER
[13]  
[Anonymous], 2005, GLOB COMP REP 2005 2
[14]  
[Anonymous], BROOKINGS PAPERS EC
[15]  
[Anonymous], 2001, NBER working paper, 8414
[16]  
[Anonymous], BROOKINGS PAPERS EC, DOI DOI 10.2307/2534564
[17]  
[Anonymous], IND EC FREED
[18]   Policy watch - Debt relief [J].
Arslanalp, S ;
Henry, PB .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2006, 20 (01) :207-220
[19]   Is debt relief efficient? [J].
Arslanalp, S ;
Henry, PB .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2005, 60 (02) :1017-1051
[20]  
ARSLANALP S, 2006, SOVEREIGN DEBT CROSS