Methods and constraints for the correction of the error beam pick-up in single dish radio observations

被引:9
作者
Bensch, F
Stutzki, J
Heithausen, A
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Inst Phys 1, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Bonn, Inst Radioastron, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
关键词
methods : data analysis; techniques : miscellaneous; telescopes; radio lines : ISM;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361:20000485
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The beam pattern of a single dish radio telescope is given by the main beam and additional components at larger angles, usually called error beam or stray pattern. The latter have relatively small peak amplitudes (typ. below -25 dB), depending on the rms surface error of the primary reflector. However, because of their large angular extent, they are sensitive to extended sources; and a significant fraction of the observed intensity can result from error beam pick-up. For (sub-)mm observations suffering from error beam pick-up we introduce a new temperature scale for the corrected data, the corrected main beam brightness temperature T-mb,T-c, which provides a better approximation to the intensity detected by the main beam than the commonly used antenna temperature and main beam brightness temperature. We consider two different correction methods. The first method uses complementary observations obtained with a smaller telescope. Smeared to the angular resolution of the error beam pattern they provide an estimate of the error beam Dick-up in the observations of the large telescope. For the second method! the error beam pick-up is de-convolved from the observed map in Fourier space. The requirements for both correction methods and their advantages and limitations are discussed in detail. Both correction methods require additional observations, unless the full spatial extent of the emission is observed. We find that the deconvolution method is attractive for the correction of fully sampled maps with an angular extent much larger than the error beam pattern. For smaller maps and more sparsely sampled observations, the subtraction method is favorable, because the additional observations with a small telescope are less time consuming.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 293
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]  
Heithausen A, 1998, ASTRON ASTROPHYS, V331, pL65
[12]  
HILLS RE, 1992, JCMT NEWSLETTER 0824
[13]  
KALBERLA PMW, 1980, ASTRON ASTROPHYS, V82, P275
[14]   APERTURE EFFICIENCY OF ITAPETINGA 45-FT ANTENNA AT GAMMA=3.3-MM [J].
KAUFMANN, P ;
ABRAHAM, Z ;
SCALISE, E ;
SCHAAL, RE ;
DOVALE, JLM ;
BOAS, JWSV .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 1987, 35 (08) :996-1000
[15]  
Kramer C., 1997, CALIBRATION SPECTRAL
[16]   RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CALIBRATION OF MILLIMETER-WAVELENGTH SPECTRAL-LINE DATA [J].
KUTNER, ML ;
ULICH, BL .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1981, 250 (01) :341-348
[17]  
PRESTAGE R, 1993, JCMT NEWSLETTER 0727
[18]  
Rohlfs K, 1996, TOOLS RADIO ASTRONOM, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-85122-6
[19]   ANTENNA TOLERANCE THEORY - A REVIEW [J].
RUZE, J .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS, 1966, 54 (04) :633-+
[20]  
Ruze J., 1952, NUOVO CIMENTO, V9, P364