Anaphoric agreement violation: An ERP analysis of its interpretation

被引:28
作者
Molinaro, Nicola [1 ]
Kim, Albert [2 ]
Vespignani, Francesco [1 ,3 ]
Job, Remo [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dipartimento Psicol Sviluppo & Socializzaz, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Psychol, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Univ Trent, Dipartimento Sci Cogniz Formaz, Trento, Italy
关键词
sentence processing; syntactic violations; number agreement; anaphora; ERPs; P600;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.006
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In the present study we analyzed the processing of grammatically anomalous sentences like The famous dancer were nervously preparing herself/themselves to face the crowd.", which contains two anomalies, one early and one late. We investigated how processing of the later anomaly (at the pronoun 'herself' or 'themselves') was affected by the processing of the early anomaly (at 'were'). We considered two processing scenarios involving the first anomaly: (1) The representation of the subject-verb number agreement error at the first verb is coerced to match the verb, rendering 'herself' anomalous; (2) The representation of the subject-verb agreement error is coerced to match the subject noun, rendering 'themselves' anomalous. Our dependent measure was event-related scalp potentials (ERPs). When the pronoun disagreed with the verb (and agreed with the subject), a P600 was recorded, while the opposite condition elicited no reliable effect. Our data suggest that interpretation of reflexive pronouns involves the reactivation of multiple lexical items, verbs included. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:963 / 974
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Abney S., 1987, The English Noun Phrase in Its SententialAspect
[2]   Ambiguity in sentence processing [J].
Altmann, GTM .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 1998, 2 (04) :146-152
[3]  
Bever T. G., 1970, Cognition and the development of language, P279, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199677139.003.0001
[4]  
DARCAIS GBF, 1982, PSYCHOL RES-PSYCH FO, V44, P231
[5]  
DARCAIS GBF, 1986, ATTENTION PERFORM, V7, P619
[6]   Differences between the morphology of gender and number: Evidence from establishing coreferences [J].
De Vincenzi, M .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 1999, 28 (05) :537-553
[7]   Differences in the perception and time course of syntactic and semantic violations [J].
De Vincenzi, M ;
Job, R ;
Di Matteo, R ;
Angrilli, A ;
Penolazzi, B ;
Ciccarelli, L ;
Vespignani, F .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2003, 85 (02) :280-296
[8]   The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences [J].
Ferreira, F .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 47 (02) :164-203
[9]  
Frazier L., 1996, Construal
[10]   Lateralization of auditory language functions: A dynamic dual pathway model [J].
Friederici, AD ;
Alter, K .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2004, 89 (02) :267-276