Differences in the perception and time course of syntactic and semantic violations

被引:82
作者
De Vincenzi, M [1 ]
Job, R
Di Matteo, R
Angrilli, A
Penolazzi, B
Ciccarelli, L
Vespignani, F
机构
[1] Univ Chieti, Dipartimento Sci Biomed, Chieti, Italy
[2] CNR, Ist Sci & Tecnol Cognizione, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Padua, Dept Dev & Social Psychol, Padua, Italy
[4] Univ Chieti, Dept Clin Sci & Bioimages, Chieti, Italy
[5] Univ Padua, Dept Gen Psychol, Padua, Italy
关键词
syntax; semantics; violations; sentence processing; ERPs; reading times;
D O I
10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00055-5
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
A reading time and an ERP experiment conducted in Italian investigated the parser's responses to a syntactic violation (subject-verb number agreement) and to a semantic violation (subject-verb selectional restriction), examining the time course of comprehension processes until sentence end. The reading-time data showed that the syntactic violation was detected earlier than the semantic one and that the two violations differed in the time-course. The ERP data fully supported the reading time data: Syntactic anomalies elicited a left anterior negativity (LAN) and a P600. Semantic anomalies elicited a N400 centred on the parietal sites which started 90 ms later (latency 430 ms) than the LAN. Furthermore, the N400 evoked by the words that followed the target word continued and increased until sentence end. The results are discussed with respect to the hypotheses that the parser constructs distinct syntactic and semantic analyses of a sentence and that this characteristic holds cross-linguistically. The appropriateness of different methodologies to the study of sentence processing is also evaluated. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 296
页数:17
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies: Evidence from event-related potentials [J].
Ainsworth-Darnell, K ;
Shulman, HG ;
Boland, JE .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 38 (01) :112-130
[2]   Cortical brain responses to semantic incongruity and syntactic violation in Italian language: an event-related potential study [J].
Angrilli, A ;
Penolazzi, B ;
Vespignani, F ;
De Vincenzi, M ;
Job, R ;
Ciccarelli, L ;
Palomba, D ;
Stegagno, L .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2002, 322 (01) :5-8
[3]  
[Anonymous], NEUROPHYSIOL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1987, MECH LANGUAGE ACQUIS
[5]  
BERWICK RC, 1984, GRAMMATICAL BASIS LI
[6]   The relationship between syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension [J].
Boland, JE .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1997, 12 (04) :423-484
[7]   Readers' eye movements distinguish anomalies of form and content [J].
Braze, D ;
Shankweiler, D ;
Ni, WJ ;
Palumbo, LC .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2002, 31 (01) :25-44
[8]   Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations [J].
Coulson, S ;
King, JW ;
Kutas, M .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1998, 13 (01) :21-58
[9]  
DeVincenzi M., 1991, Syntactic Parsing Strategies in Italian
[10]   Tasks and timing in the perception of linguistic anomaly [J].
Fodor, JD ;
Ni, WJ ;
Crain, S ;
Shankweiler, D .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 1996, 25 (01) :25-57