Predictive factors for successful sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence: results of trial stimulation in 200 patients

被引:43
作者
Gallas, S. [1 ]
Michot, F. [1 ]
Faucheron, J. L. [2 ]
Meurette, G. [3 ]
Lehur, P. A. [3 ]
Barth, X. [4 ]
Damon, H. [5 ]
Mion, F. [5 ]
Rullier, E. [6 ]
Zerbib, F. [7 ]
Sielezneff, I. [8 ]
Ouaiss, M. [8 ]
Orsoni, P. [9 ]
Desfourneaux, V. [10 ]
Siproudhis, L. [11 ]
Mathonnet, M. [12 ]
Menard, J. F. [13 ]
Leroi, A. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rouen Univ Hosp, IFR MP 23, ADEN EA 3234, Rouen, France
[2] Grenoble Univ Hosp, Surg Unit, Grenoble, France
[3] Univ Hosp, Surg Unit, Nantes, France
[4] Lyon Univ Hosp, Surg Unit, Lyon, France
[5] Lyon Univ Hosp, Digest Physiol Unit, Lyon, France
[6] Bordeaux Univ Hosp, Surg Unit, Bordeaux, France
[7] Bordeaux Univ Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Bordeaux, France
[8] Marseille Univ Hosp, La Timone Hosp, Surg Unit, Marseille, France
[9] Marseille Univ Hosp, Nord Hosp, Surg Unit, Marseille, France
[10] Rennes Univ Hosp, Surg Unit, Rennes, France
[11] Rennes Univ Hosp, Gastroenterol Unit, Rennes, France
[12] Limoges Univ Hosp, Surg Unit, Limoges, France
[13] Biostat Unit, Rouen, France
关键词
Faecal incontinence; sacral nerve stimulation; predictive factors of success; NEUROMODULATION; SCALE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02260.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has a place in the treatment algorithm for faecal incontinence (FI). However, after implantation, 15-30% of patients with FI fail to respond for unknown reasons. We investigated the effect of SNS on continence and quality of life (QOL) and tried to identify specific predictive factors of the success of permanent SNS in the treatment of FI. Method Two hundred consecutive patients (six men; median age = 60; range 16-81) underwent permanent implantation for FI. The severity of FI was evaluated by the Cleveland Clinic Score. Quality of life was evaluated by the French version of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) quality of life questionnaire (FIQL). All patients underwent a preoperative evaluation. After permanent implantation, severity and QOL scores were reevaluated after six and 12 months and then once a year. Results The severity scores were significantly reduced during SNS (P = 0.001). QOL improved in all domains. At the 6-month follow-up, the clinical outcome of the permanent implant was not affected by age, gender, duration of symptoms, QOL, main causes of FI, anorectal manometry or endoanal ultrasound results. Only loose stool consistency (P = 0.01), persistent FI even though diarrhoea was controlled by medical treatment (P = 0.004), and low stimulation intensity (P = 0.02) were associated with improved short-term outcomes. Multivariate analysis confirmed that loose stool consistency and low stimulation intensity were related to a favourable outcome. Conclusion Stool consistency and low stimulation intensity have been identified as predictive factors for the short-term outcome of SNS.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 696
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Measuring fecal incontinence [J].
Baxter, NN ;
Rothenberger, DA ;
Lowry, AC .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2003, 46 (12) :1591-1605
[2]   Sacral nerve stimulation results may be improved by electrodiagnostic techniques [J].
Benson, JT .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL AND PELVIC FLOOR DYSFUNCTION, 2000, 11 (06) :352-357
[3]   Outcome measures for fecal incontinence: Anorectal structure and function [J].
Bharucha, AE .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (01) :S90-S98
[4]   Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence:: External anal sphincter defect vs. intact anal sphincter [J].
Chan, Miranda K. Y. ;
Tjandra, Joe J. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2008, 51 (07) :1015-1024
[5]   Predictive factors for successful sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence: a 10-year cohort analysis [J].
Dudding, T. C. ;
Pares, D. ;
Vaizey, C. J. ;
Kamm, M. A. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2008, 10 (03) :249-256
[6]   Sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence and urinary incontinence in female patients: long-term follow-up [J].
El-Gazzaz, Galal ;
Zutshi, Massarat ;
Salcedo, Levilester ;
Hammel, Jeff ;
Rackley, Raymond ;
Hull, Tracy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 24 (12) :1377-1381
[7]   Does magnetic stimulation of sacral nerve roots modify colonic motility? Results of a randomized double-blind sham-controlled study [J].
Gallas, S. ;
Gourcerol, G. ;
Ducrotte, P. ;
Mosni, G. ;
Menard, J. -F. ;
Michot, F. ;
Leroi, A. -M. .
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2009, 21 (04) :411-419
[8]   Sacral nerve stimulation in fecal incontinence: Are there factors associated with success? [J].
Gourcerol, Guillaume ;
Gallas, Syrine ;
Michot, Francis ;
Denis, Philippe ;
Leroi, Anne-Marie .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (01) :3-12
[9]   Sacral nerve stimulation for neurogenic faecal incontinence [J].
Holzer, B. ;
Rosen, H. R. ;
Novi, G. ;
Ausch, C. ;
Hoelbling, N. ;
Schiessel, R. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 94 (06) :749-753
[10]   Systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation [J].
Jarrett, MED ;
Mowatt, G ;
Glazener, CMA ;
Fraser, C ;
Nicholls, RJ ;
Grant, AM ;
Kamm, MA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 91 (12) :1559-1569