Molecular dosimetry in fish: quantitative target organ DNA adduction and hepatocarcinogenicity for four aflatoxins by two exposure routes in rainbow trout

被引:16
作者
Bailey, GS [1 ]
Dashwood, R
Loveland, PM
Pereira, C
Hendricks, JD
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Marine Freshwater Biomed Sci Ctr, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Univ Hawaii, Dept Environm Biochem, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[3] Oregon State Univ, Dept Stat, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
关键词
molecular dosimetry; aflatoxin; rainbow trout; DNA; carcinogenesis; tumor;
D O I
10.1016/S0027-5107(97)00258-3
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Rainbow trout, a species highly sensitive to aflatoxins, was used to investigate the relative carcinogenicities of four structurally related aflatoxins in terms of their target organ DNA binding characteristics. Tritiated syntheses were carried out, DNA binding dose-response curves were established, and liver DNA binding indices were calculated for the four aflatoxins following a 2-week dietary fry exposure protocol. The results indicated that adduct levels increased linearly with dietary dose concentration, with relative DNA binding indices of 20.7, 20.3, 2.35, and 2.22 X 10(3) (pmoles aflatoxin mg(-1) DNA)/(pmoles aflatoxin g(-1) diet) for aflatoxin B-1 (AFB(1)), aflatoxicol (AFL), aflatoxin M-1 (AFM(1)), and aflatoxicol M-1 (AFLM(1)), respectively, A similar protocol used over 7200 trout fry averaging 1.2 g initial body weight to establish full carcinogen dose-response curves for each aflatoxin, along with a single-dose estimate of DNA binding index within the tumor study animals. Owing to trout sensitivity a total of 180 mu g or less of each aflatoxin was required. Data analyzed on legit incidence vs. Ln dose coordinates generated four curves which were modeled as parallel in slope over most or all dose ranges studied. By this analysis, relative tumorigenic potencies were: AFB(1) 1.00; AFL 0.936; AFM(1) 0.086; and AFLM(1) 0.041, When data were plotted as legit incidence vs. Ln adducts (effective dose received), all aflatoxin adducts described the same dose-response curve; that is, they were equally tumorigenic, except those from AFLM(1), which were 2-3 fold less potent. Therefore, by these molecular dose studies, differences in tumorigenicity among the four dietary aflatoxins are largely or entirely accounted for by differences in uptake and metabolism leading to DNA adduction, rather than any inherent differences in tumor initiating potency per DNA adduct, (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 244
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
[41]   DNA CONFORMATION MEDIATES AFLATOXIN B1-DNA BINDING AND THE FORMATION OF GUANINE N7 ADDUCTS BY AFLATOXIN-B1 8,9-EXO-EPOXIDE [J].
RANEY, VM ;
HARRIS, TM ;
STONE, MP .
CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 1993, 6 (01) :64-68
[42]   APPLICATION OF NEW TECHNIQUES FOR THE DETECTION OF CARCINOGEN ADDUCTS TO HUMAN-POPULATION MONITORING [J].
SANTELLA, RM .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1988, 205 (1-4) :271-282
[43]  
SHELTON DW, 1983, AQUAT TOXICOL, V3, P229, DOI 10.1016/0166-445X(83)90043-7
[44]  
Sinnhuber R O, 1978, Ann N Y Acad Sci, V298, P389, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb19280.x
[45]   HEPATIC CARCINOGENESIS OF AFLATOXIN M1 IN RAINBOW-TROUT (SALMO-GAIRDNERI) AND ITS ENHANCEMENT BY CYCLOPROPENE FATTY-ACIDS [J].
SINNHUBER, RO ;
LEE, DJ ;
WALES, JH ;
LANDERS, MK ;
KEYL, AC .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1974, 53 (05) :1285-1288
[46]   PROTEIN ADDUCTS AS BIOMARKERS OF HUMAN CARCINOGEN EXPOSURE [J].
SKIPPER, PL ;
PENG, XC ;
SOOHOO, CK ;
TANNENBAUM, SR .
DRUG METABOLISM REVIEWS, 1994, 26 (1-2) :111-124
[47]  
SWENBERG J A, 1989, Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting, V30, P658
[48]  
SWENBERG JA, 1987, PROG EXP TUMOR RES, V31, P42
[49]  
TURTELTAUB KW, 1993, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V99, P183