Back and abdominal muscle function during stabilization exercises

被引:172
作者
Arokoski, JP
Valta, T
Airaksinen, O
Kankaanpää, M
机构
[1] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[2] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Rehabil Clin, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2001年 / 82卷 / 08期
关键词
abdominal muscles; back; electromyography; low back pain; muscles; rehabilitation;
D O I
10.1053/apmr.2001.23819
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the paraspinal and abdominal muscle activities during different therapeutic exercises and to study how load increment produced by varying limb movements and trunk positions could affect these muscle activities. Design: A cross-sectional study comparing muscle activities between men and women. Setting: Rehabilitation clinic in university hospital. Participants: Twenty-four healthy volunteers (14 women, 10 men) aged 21 to 39 years. Interventions: Subjects performed 16 different therapeutic exercises commonly used to treat low back pain. Main Outcome Measures: Surface electromyography was recorded from the paraspinal (T9, L5) and abdominal (rectus abdominis, obliquus externus) muscles during these exercises. Average electromyographic amplitudes obtained during the excercises were normalized to the amplitude in maximal voluntary contraction (% MVC) to produce interindividually comparable muscle activity assessments. Results: Mean average normalized electromyographic amplitudes (% MVQ of the exercises were below 50% MVC. At L5 level, the multifidus muscle activities were significantly higher (p <.05) in women than in men, whereas no significant difference was found at T9 level. Similarly, rectus abdominis and obliquus externus activities were significantly higher (p <.001, p <.05) in women than in men. Load increment in hands or unbalanced trunk and limb movements produced higher paraspinal and abdominal muscle activities (p <.05). Conclusions: Simple therapeutic exercises are effective in activating both abdominal and paraspinal muscles. By changing limb and trunk positions or unbalancing trunk movements, it is possible to increase trunk muscle activities. Women were better able to activate their stabilizing trunk muscles than men; but it is also possible that men, having a much higher degree of strength on maximal contraction, only need to activate a smaller amount of that maximum to perform a similar activity.
引用
收藏
页码:1089 / 1098
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
[21]   Multifidus muscle recovery is not automatic after resolution of acute, first-episode low back pain [J].
Hides, JA ;
Richardson, CA ;
Jull, GA .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (23) :2763-2769
[22]   EVIDENCE OF LUMBAR MULTIFIDUS MUSCLE WASTING IPSILATERAL TO SYMPTOMS IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE SUBACUTE LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
HIDES, JA ;
STOKES, MJ ;
SAIDE, M ;
JULL, GA ;
COOPER, DH .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (02) :165-172
[23]   BODY-COMPOSITION, ENDURANCE, STRENGTH, CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA, AND DENSITY OF MM ERECTOR SPINAE IN MEN WITH AND WITHOUT LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
HULTMAN, G ;
NORDIN, M ;
SARASTE, H ;
OHLSEN, H .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1993, 6 (02) :114-123
[24]   Interaction between the porcine lumbar intervertebral disc, zygapophysial joints, and paraspinal muscles [J].
Indahl, A ;
Kaigle, AM ;
Reikerås, O ;
Holm, SH .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (24) :2834-2840
[25]   Electromyographic response of the porcine multifidus musculature after nerve stimulation [J].
Indahl, A ;
Kaige, A ;
Reikeras, O ;
Holm, S .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (24) :2652-2658
[26]  
Johnson B, 1970, ELECTROGRAPHY, V10, P5
[27]   The efficacy of active rehabilitation in chronic low back pain -: Effect on pain intensity, self-experienced disability, and lumbar fatigability [J].
Kankaanpää, M ;
Taimela, S ;
Airaksinen, O ;
Hänninen, O .
SPINE, 1999, 24 (10) :1034-1042
[28]  
Magnusson M L, 1996, Eur Spine J, V5, P23, DOI 10.1007/BF00307824
[29]  
MANNICHE C, 1988, LANCET, V2, P1473
[30]   INTENSIVE DYNAMIC BACK EXERCISES FOR CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN - A CLINICAL-TRIAL [J].
MANNICHE, C ;
LUNDBERG, E ;
CHRISTENSEN, I ;
BENTZEN, L ;
HESSELSOE, G .
PAIN, 1991, 47 (01) :53-63