Molecular subtypes of breast cancers detected in mammography screening and outside of screening

被引:91
作者
Sihto, Hard [2 ]
Lundin, Johan [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Lehtimaki, Tina [1 ]
Sarlomo-Rikala, Maarit [6 ]
Butzow, Ralf [3 ,6 ]
Holli, Kaija [7 ]
Sailas, Liisa [9 ]
Kataja, Vesa [9 ,10 ]
Lundin, Mikael [1 ]
Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, Thina [11 ]
Isola, Jorma [8 ]
Heikkila, Paivi [6 ]
Joensuu, Heikki [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Oncol, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Biomedicum, Mol Oncol Lab, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Dept Oncol, Biomed Informat Res Grp, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[5] Univ Helsinki, Folkhalsan Res Ctr, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[6] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Pathol, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[7] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Palliat Med & Oncol, Tampere, Finland
[8] Tampere Univ Hosp, Inst Med Technol, Tampere, Finland
[9] Vaasa Cent Hosp, Dept Oncol, Vaasa, Finland
[10] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, SF-70210 Kuopio, Finland
[11] Oulu Univ, Cent Hosp, Dept Oncol & Radiol, SF-90220 Oulu, Finland
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The frequency and significance of gene expression profile-derived molecular subtypes of breast cancers found in mammography screening are unknown. Experimental Design: We identified breast cancers diagnosed in women of any age living in defined geographic regions in Finland in 1991 to 1992 and collected clinical and pathologic data. Surrogates for the molecular subtypes were determined for 247 cancers found in organized mammography screening and 989 cancers detected outside of screening using immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization. Molecular subtypes were defined as luminal A [estrogen receptor (ER) positive and/or progesterone receptor (PR) positive, HER2-], luminal B (ER+ and/ or PR+, HER2+), basal-like (ER-, PR-, HER2-, cytokeratin 5+, and/or HER1+), HER2+/ER(ER-, PR-, and HER2+), and unclassified. The median follow-up time was 9.4 years. Results: The luminal type A was common (73.7%) and the HER2+/ER- type is rare (5.7%) in screen-detected cancer, and only 16% were HER2 positive. Women with cancer diagnosed in screening at ages 50 to 69 years had similar molecular subtype distribution as women whose cancer was found outside of screening at age >69 years. In a multivariate model, cancer detection at screening independently predicted favorable distant disease-free survival when the molecular subtype was included as a covariate in addition to age, histologic grade, and cancer size. Women with small (pT(1)N(0)M(0)) HER2-positive cancer had similar outcome regardless of the method of detection. Conclusions: Molecular subtype distribution of screen-detected breast cancer differs from that of cancers found outside of screening and accounts in part for the better outcome of screen-detected cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:4103 / 4110
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]  
Ristimäki A, 2002, CANCER RES, V62, P632
[32]  
SENIE RT, 1994, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V73, P1666, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940315)73:6<1666::AID-CNCR2820730619>3.0.CO
[33]  
2-E
[34]   Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: Analysis of randomized screening trials [J].
Shen, Y ;
Yang, Y ;
Inoue, LYT ;
Munsell, MF ;
Miller, AB ;
Berry, DA .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (16) :1195-1203
[35]   Endothelial cell KIT expression in human tumours [J].
Sihto, H. ;
Tynninen, O. ;
Butzow, R. ;
Saarialho-Kere, U. ;
Joensuu, H. .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2007, 211 (04) :481-488
[36]   Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets [J].
Sorlie, T ;
Tibshirani, R ;
Parker, J ;
Hastie, T ;
Marron, JS ;
Nobel, A ;
Deng, S ;
Johnsen, H ;
Pesich, R ;
Geisler, S ;
Demeter, J ;
Perou, CM ;
Lonning, PE ;
Brown, PO ;
Borresen-Dale, AL ;
Botstein, D .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (14) :8418-8423
[37]   Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications [J].
Sorlie, T ;
Perou, CM ;
Tibshirani, R ;
Aas, T ;
Geisler, S ;
Johnsen, H ;
Hastie, T ;
Eisen, MB ;
van de Rijn, M ;
Jeffrey, SS ;
Thorsen, T ;
Quist, H ;
Matese, JC ;
Brown, PO ;
Botstein, D ;
Lonning, PE ;
Borresen-Dale, AL .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (19) :10869-10874
[38]   Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer [J].
van't Veer, LJ ;
Dai, HY ;
van de Vijver, MJ ;
He, YDD ;
Hart, AAM ;
Mao, M ;
Peterse, HL ;
van der Kooy, K ;
Marton, MJ ;
Witteveen, AT ;
Schreiber, GJ ;
Kerkhoven, RM ;
Roberts, C ;
Linsley, PS ;
Bernards, R ;
Friend, SH .
NATURE, 2002, 415 (6871) :530-536
[39]   Gene-expression pro-files to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer [J].
Wang, YX ;
Klijn, JGM ;
Zhang, Y ;
Sieuwerts, A ;
Look, MP ;
Yang, F ;
Talantov, D ;
Timmermans, M ;
Meijer-van Gelder, ME ;
Yu, J ;
Jatkoe, T ;
Berns, EMJJ ;
Atkins, D ;
Foekens, JA .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9460) :671-679
[40]   Incidence of breast cancer in Norway and Sweden during introduction of nationwide screening:: prospective cohort study [J].
Zahl, PH ;
Strand, H ;
Mæhlen, J .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7445) :921-924