Predictors of post-ERCP complications in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis

被引:104
作者
Mehta, SN
Pavone, E
Barkun, JS
Bouchard, S
Barkun, AN
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Montreal Gen Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Montreal Gen Hosp, Div Gen Surg, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Montreal Gen Hosp, Div Clin Epidemiol, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Royal Victoria Hosp, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A1, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-1001308
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Study Aims: Determinants of complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) have not yet been completely characterized, Patients and Methods: Data were collected from an endoscopic database. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to generate the best model of independent predictors of post-ERCP pancreatitis, Results: The database included 1239 ERCP examinations carried out to investigate suspected choledocholithiasis over a five-year period. From these, 45 patients who developed post-ERCP complications were compared to a random sample of 486 patients who had undergone an uncomplicated ERCP for suspected choledocholithiasis, Univariate analysis demonstrated significant differences between the two patient groups for the following factors: age, using a cut-off point of 59 years (27% vs. 51%, P = 0.002), pancreatic channel opacification (73% vs. 58%, P = 0.05), and absence of common bile duct stones (41% vs. 24%, P = 0.03), Using multivariate logistic regression, the best model for predicting post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients undergoing sphincterotomy included age under 59 years (P = 0.04), and absence of a common bile duct stone (P = 0.004), The model yielded probabilities of developing post-sphincterotomy pancreatitis that ranged from 2.8% if no predictor was present, to 27% when both predictors were present. Among patients in whom a sphincterotomy was not performed, the only significant independent predictor found was pancreatic channel opacification (P = 0,05), Conclusion: Age under 59 years, pancreatic channel opacification, and an absence of common bile duct stones at ERCP are all independent predictors of post-ERCP pancreatitis.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 463
页数:7
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [31] PERSSON B, 1992, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V39, P259
  • [32] PODOLSKY I, 1987, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V82, pA972
  • [33] IS ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY FOR DISABLING BILIARY-TYPE PAIN AFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY EFFECTIVE
    ROBERTSTHOMSON, IC
    TOOULI, J
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1985, 31 (06) : 370 - 373
  • [34] POST-ERCP PANCREATITIS - ASSOCIATION WITH UROGRAPHIC VISUALIZATION DURING ERCP
    ROSZLER, MH
    CAMPBELL, WL
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1985, 157 (03) : 595 - 598
  • [35] EXPERIMENTAL PANCREATOGRAPHY - A COMPARISON OF 3 CONTRAST-MEDIA
    SAARI, A
    KIVISAARI, L
    STANDERTSKJOLDNORDENSTAM, CG
    BRACKETT, K
    SCHRODER, T
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1988, 23 (01) : 53 - 58
  • [36] PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF THE EFFECT OF NIFEDIPINE ON PANCREATIC IRRITATION AFTER ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY
    SAND, J
    NORDBACK, I
    [J]. DIGESTION, 1993, 54 (02) : 105 - 111
  • [37] SHAKOOR T, 1992, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V38, P251
  • [38] POST-ERCP PANCREATITIS - RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE-STUDY COMPARING A LOW-OSMOLALITY AND HIGH-OSMOLALITY CONTRAST AGENT
    SHERMAN, S
    HAWES, RH
    RATHGABER, SW
    UZER, MF
    SMITH, MT
    KHUSRO, QE
    SILVERMAN, WB
    EARLE, DT
    LEHMAN, GA
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1994, 40 (04) : 422 - 427
  • [39] SPHINCTER OF ODDI MANOMETRY - DECREASED RISK OF CLINICAL PANCREATITIS WITH USE OF A MODIFIED ASPIRATING CATHETER
    SHERMAN, S
    TROIANO, FP
    HAWES, RH
    LEHMAN, GA
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1990, 36 (05) : 462 - 466
  • [40] COMPLICATIONS OF ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY - A PROSPECTIVE SERIES WITH EMPHASIS ON THE INCREASED RISK ASSOCIATED WITH SPHINCTER OF ODDI DYSFUNCTION AND NONDILATED BILE-DUCTS
    SHERMAN, S
    RUFFOLO, TA
    HAWES, RH
    LEHMAN, GA
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1991, 101 (04) : 1068 - 1075