How to assess and compare the accuracy of continuous glucose monitors?

被引:38
作者
Wentholt, I. M. E. [1 ]
Hart, A. A. M. [2 ]
Hoekstra, J. B. L. [1 ]
Devries, J. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1089/dia.2007.0216
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Continuous glucose monitors may be valuable tools for improving glycemic control and avoiding hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes. To this goal, sensor readings must adequately reflect the actual blood glucose, emphasizing the need for solid accuracy assessment methods for continuous glucose sensor readings. Analysis of continuous glucose data is challenging, and despite many efforts there still is no all-embracing method to overcome the obstacles in the assessment of continuous data. In this review we disclose the weaknesses of currently available methods and propose a guideline for sensor accuracy assessment and comparison. For accuracy assessment it is best to first plot the sensor readings against the reference values and draw a line of identity, visualizing the degree of agreement. Thereafter data pairs should be given in a Bland-Altman plot to detect a possible relationship between the difference and the mean. The next step is to calculate the absolute relative difference over all paired readings together and per glucose range. A possible lag time between the measurements of both methods can be detected by combined curve fitting. Finally, sensitivity and positive predictive value for detecting hypoglycemia are important indicators of the sensors' performance. For comparing the accuracy between different glucose sensors it is best to use indirect comparison against blood glucose, rather than direct comparison methods, since none of the current glucose sensors is accurate enough to be considered the reference value.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 68
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[21]   Clinical performance of CGMS in type 1 diabetic patients treated by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion using insulin analogs [J].
Guerci, B ;
Floriot, M ;
Böhme, P ;
Durain, D ;
Benichou, M ;
Jellimann, S ;
Drouin, P .
DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (03) :582-589
[22]  
Harrell FE., 2001, REGRESSION MODELING, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-19425-7
[23]  
Hayter Paul G, 2005, Diabetes Technol Ther, V7, P721, DOI 10.1089/dia.2005.7.721
[24]   Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science [J].
Hopkins, WG .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2000, 30 (01) :1-15
[25]  
Hopkins WG, 2004, SPORTSCIENCE, V8, P42
[26]   Inflammatory markers and diabetic retinopathy in type 1 diabetes [J].
Izuora, KE ;
Chase, HP ;
Jackson, WE ;
Coll, JR ;
Osberg, IM ;
Gottlieb, PA ;
Rewers, MJ ;
Garg, SK .
DIABETES CARE, 2005, 28 (03) :714-715
[27]   A pilot study of the continuous glucose monitoring system - Clinical decisions and glycemic control after its use in pediatric type 1 diabetic subjects [J].
Kaufman, FR ;
Gibson, LC ;
Halvorson, M ;
Carpenter, S ;
Fisher, LK ;
Pitukcheewanont, P .
DIABETES CARE, 2001, 24 (12) :2030-2034
[28]  
Klonoff David C, 2005, Diabetes Technol Ther, V7, P770, DOI 10.1089/dia.2005.7.770
[29]  
Kollman Craig, 2005, Diabetes Technol Ther, V7, P665, DOI 10.1089/dia.2005.7.665
[30]   Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: A critical review [J].
Ludbrook, J .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 29 (07) :527-536