Quantitative review of riparian buffer width guidelines from Canada and the United States

被引:293
作者
Lee, P [1 ]
Smyth, C [1 ]
Boutin, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Biol Sci, Integrated Landscape Management Program, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada
关键词
riparian; management; buffers; forestry; streamside; guidelines; Canada; United States;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.11.009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper reviewed the provincial, territorial, and state guidelines for the retention of treed riparian buffers after timber harvest in Canada and the United States. Comparisons amongst jurisdictions were facilitated through the use of a standardized template for the classification of waterbodies. Mean buffer widths varied from 15.1 to 29.0 m for different waterbody types when both countries were combined. However, Canadian jurisdictions had wider buffers (except for intermittent streams). In part, this was due to the high percentage of Boreal jurisdictions in Canada and Southeast jurisdictions in the United States. The Boreal region had the widest buffers while Southeastern jurisdictions had the narrowest buffers. Just under half (similar to44%) of the jurisdictions investigated had three or more modifying factors in the guidelines. Of these, waterbody type, shoreline slope, waterbody size, and presence of fish were the most common. Boreal and Pacific jurisdictions tended to have a more diverse set of waterbody size classes, waterbody types, and other modifying factors. Jurisdictions from the Midwest, Northeast, and Southeast maintained relatively simple `one-size-fits-all' guidelines. Jurisdictions without modifying factors for slope or presence of fish applied wider baseline buffers than jurisdictions with these factors. A large percentage of jurisdictions (similar to80%) allowed some selective harvest in buffers. However, these were often accompanied by relatively restrictive prescriptions. In comparison to the ecological recommendations, buffer widths for most jurisdictions were adequate to protect the aquatic biota and habitats but were, generally, less than recommended widths for terrestrial communities. In the future, two management trends are likely to continue, the shift towards more complicated guidelines and the expansion to larger-scale, watershed planning of riparian areas. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 180
页数:16
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   WATER-QUALITY AFTER CLEARCUTTING A SMALL WATERSHED IN WEST-VIRGINIA [J].
AUBERTIN, GM ;
PATRIC, JH .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1974, 3 (03) :243-249
[3]  
BINKLEY D, 1993, WATER RESOUR BULL, V29, P729
[4]  
Brazier J.R., 1973, 15 OREG STAT U FOR R
[5]  
Brosofske KD, 1997, ECOL APPL, V7, P1188, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[1188:HEOMGF]2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   PREDICTING TEMPERATURES OF SMALL STREAMS [J].
BROWN, GW .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1969, 5 (01) :68-&
[8]   USE OF SHORELINE TIMBER RESERVES BY MOOSE [J].
BRUSNYK, LM ;
GILBERT, FF .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1983, 47 (03) :673-685
[9]  
Calhoun JM, 1988, STREAMSIDE MANAGEMEN, V59, P207
[10]   WOODY DEBRIS, CHANNEL FEATURES, AND MACROINVERTEBRATES OF STREAMS WITH LOGGED AND UNDISTURBED RIPARIAN TIMBER IN NORTHEASTERN OREGON, USA [J].
CARLSON, JY ;
ANDRUS, CW ;
FROEHLICH, HA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 1990, 47 (06) :1103-1111