Quantitative review of riparian buffer width guidelines from Canada and the United States

被引:293
作者
Lee, P [1 ]
Smyth, C [1 ]
Boutin, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Biol Sci, Integrated Landscape Management Program, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada
关键词
riparian; management; buffers; forestry; streamside; guidelines; Canada; United States;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.11.009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper reviewed the provincial, territorial, and state guidelines for the retention of treed riparian buffers after timber harvest in Canada and the United States. Comparisons amongst jurisdictions were facilitated through the use of a standardized template for the classification of waterbodies. Mean buffer widths varied from 15.1 to 29.0 m for different waterbody types when both countries were combined. However, Canadian jurisdictions had wider buffers (except for intermittent streams). In part, this was due to the high percentage of Boreal jurisdictions in Canada and Southeast jurisdictions in the United States. The Boreal region had the widest buffers while Southeastern jurisdictions had the narrowest buffers. Just under half (similar to44%) of the jurisdictions investigated had three or more modifying factors in the guidelines. Of these, waterbody type, shoreline slope, waterbody size, and presence of fish were the most common. Boreal and Pacific jurisdictions tended to have a more diverse set of waterbody size classes, waterbody types, and other modifying factors. Jurisdictions from the Midwest, Northeast, and Southeast maintained relatively simple `one-size-fits-all' guidelines. Jurisdictions without modifying factors for slope or presence of fish applied wider baseline buffers than jurisdictions with these factors. A large percentage of jurisdictions (similar to80%) allowed some selective harvest in buffers. However, these were often accompanied by relatively restrictive prescriptions. In comparison to the ecological recommendations, buffer widths for most jurisdictions were adequate to protect the aquatic biota and habitats but were, generally, less than recommended widths for terrestrial communities. In the future, two management trends are likely to continue, the shift towards more complicated guidelines and the expansion to larger-scale, watershed planning of riparian areas. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 180
页数:16
相关论文
共 80 条
[21]   Winter activity of mammals in riparian zones and adjacent forests prior to and following clear-cutting at Copper Lake, Newfoundland, Canada [J].
Forsey, ES ;
Baggs, EM .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2001, 145 (03) :163-171
[22]   Decreased carbon and nutrient input to boreal lakes from particulate organic matter following riparian clear-cutting [J].
France, R ;
Culbert, H ;
Peters, R .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1996, 20 (04) :579-583
[23]   NATURAL CAVITIES USED BY WOOD DUCKS IN NORTH-CENTRAL MINNESOTA [J].
GILMER, DS ;
BALL, IJ ;
COWARDIN, LM ;
MATHISEN, JE ;
RIECHMANN, JH .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1978, 42 (02) :288-298
[24]   AN ECOSYSTEM PERSPECTIVE OF RIPARIAN ZONES [J].
GREGORY, SV ;
SWANSON, FJ ;
MCKEE, WA ;
CUMMINS, KW .
BIOSCIENCE, 1991, 41 (08) :540-551
[25]  
Harper KA, 2001, ECOLOGY, V82, P649, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0649:SACORB]2.0.CO
[26]  
2
[27]   Large woody debris in bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) spawning streams of logged and wilderness watersheds in northwest Montana [J].
Hauer, FR ;
Poole, GC ;
Gangemi, JT ;
Baxter, CV .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 1999, 56 (06) :915-924
[28]  
HAUPT HAROLD F., 1965, J FOREST, V63, P664
[29]  
Helvey J. D., 1972, Proceedings, [US] National Symposium on Watershed in Transition., P308
[30]  
Ilhardt BL, 2000, RIPARIAN MANAGEMENT IN FORESTS OF THE CONTINENTAL EASTERN UNITED STATES, P23