Connectivity analysis with structural equation modelling:: an example of the effects of voxel selection

被引:43
作者
Gonçalves, MS [1 ]
Hall, DA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, MRC, Inst Hearing Res, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
fMRI; summary measures; effective connectivity; functional heterogeneity;
D O I
10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00394-X
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Structural equation modelling (SEM) of neuroimaging data is commonly applied to a network of distributed brain regions. We applied SEM to an fMRI dataset to identify condition-specific effects in a simple experiment composed of visual stimulation and baseline conditions. The visual network was composed of three well-defined anatomical regions (V 1, V2, and V5) and three path connections (V1 --> V2, V1 --> V5, and V2 --> V5). This network was used to test four hypotheses: (1) whether the condition-specific effects for all three connections vary according to the data selected for modelling; (2) whether the "summary" measures that are often used are indeed appropriate; (3) whether measures taken from the voxel timecourse can reliably predict the condition-specific effects for each one of the three path connections, and (4) whether all voxels within an anatomical region yield equivalent SEM outcomes. There was some variability in the significance of the condition-specific effects across randomly selected voxels within regions. However, the SEM outcome from the "summary" measures was comparable to the most frequent pattern of condition-specific effects. Magnitude, delay, spread, and goodness-of-fit measures taken from a gamma fit to the voxel time courses predicted reliably the significance of the SEM condition-specific effects for each connection. This result enabled us to identify spatially coherent regions at the boundaries of V2 that displayed different condition-specific effects from those seen in the majority of the voxels. Although the generality of these results awaits further investigation, this example highlights a number of important issues for SEM. We have provided further evidence that the SEM outcome does vary somewhat according to the voxels selected and that, although the use of summary measures can give a generalised view of the connectivity pattern, they could fail to capture functional differences within specialised areas. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1455 / 1467
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Brodmann's areas 17 and 18 brought into stereotaxic space - Where and how variable? [J].
Amunts, K ;
Malikovic, A ;
Mohlberg, H ;
Schormann, T ;
Zilles, K .
NEUROIMAGE, 2000, 11 (01) :66-84
[2]  
Büchel C, 1999, SCIENCE, V283, P1538, DOI 10.1126/science.283.5407.1538
[3]   Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: Cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI [J].
Buchel, C ;
Friston, KJ .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 1997, 7 (08) :768-778
[4]   How good is good enough in path analysis of fMRI data? [J].
Bullmore, ET ;
Horwitz, B ;
Honey, G ;
Brammer, M ;
Williams, S ;
Sharma, T .
NEUROIMAGE, 2000, 11 (04) :289-301
[5]   Corticolimbic interactions associated with performance on a short-term memory task are modified by age [J].
Della-Maggiore, V ;
Sekuler, AB ;
Grady, CL ;
Bennett, PJ ;
Sekuler, R ;
McIntosh, AR .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 20 (22) :8410-8416
[6]   OFFENDING ESTIMATES IN COVARIANCE STRUCTURE-ANALYSIS - COMMENTS ON THE CAUSES OF AND SOLUTIONS TO HEYWOOD CASES [J].
DILLON, WR ;
KUMAR, A ;
MULANI, N .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1987, 101 (01) :126-135
[7]   Unattended home diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea without polysomnography [J].
Fletcher, EC ;
Stich, J ;
Yang, KL .
ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2000, 9 (02) :168-174
[8]   Can meaningful effective connectivities be obtained between auditory cortical regions? [J].
Gonçalves, MS ;
Hall, DA ;
Johnsrude, IS ;
Haggard, MP .
NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 14 (06) :1353-1360
[9]  
Grafton Scott T., 1994, Human Brain Mapping, V2, P45, DOI 10.1002/hbm.460020106
[10]   A method for determining venous contribution to BOLD contrast sensory activation [J].
Hall, DA ;
Gonçalves, MS ;
Smith, S ;
Jezzard, P ;
Haggard, MP ;
Kornak, J .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2002, 20 (10) :695-706